Fetal weight estimation by three-dimensional ultrasound

被引:89
作者
Schild, RL
Fimmers, R
Hansmann, M
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Prenatal Diag & Therapy, Ctr Obstet & Gynaecol, Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Bonn, Inst Med Stat, Bonn, Germany
关键词
fetal weight estimation; three-dimensional ultrasound; 3D volumetry;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00249.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the value of three-dimensional volume scanning in predicting fetal weight at birth. Study design Prospective cross-sectional study within 7 days of delivery A total of 190 patients were considered for final analysis (formula-finding group: n = 125, formula evaluation group: n = 65). Inclusion criteria were a singleton pregnancy and absence of chromosomal or significant structural anomalies. Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric measurements of the fetal thigh, upper arm and abdomen were performed together with conventional two-dimensional (2D) biometry. Results All measurements were completed successfully in each patient. Polynomial regression analysis with standard biometric parameters and volumes of the upper arm, the thigh and the abdomen was employed to yield the best-fit formula for prediction of fetal weight at birth. The new 3D formula (estimated fetal weight (EFW) = -1478.557 + 7.242 x thigh volume + 13.309 x upper arm volume +852.998 x log(10) abdominal volume + 0.526 x BPD3) proved to be superior to established 2D equations with the lowest mean error (25.8 +/- 194.4 g), the lowest mean absolute error (155.2 +/- 118.2 g) and the lowest mean absolute percentage error (6.1 +/- 5.0%) when studied prospectively in the evaluation group. Conclusion 3D sonography allows superior fetal weight estimation by including soft tissue volume. Further studies at the extremes of fetal weight are needed to confirm the value of our formula in these subsets.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 452
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Balouet P., 1994, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, V23, P64
[2]  
Balouet P., 1992, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, V21, P795
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION FROM ULTRASONIC 3-DIMENSIONAL HEAD AND TRUNK RECONSTRUCTIONS - EVALUATION INVITRO [J].
BRINKLEY, JF ;
MCCALLUM, WD ;
MURAMATSU, SK ;
LIU, DY .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 144 (06) :715-721
[5]  
CATALANO PM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P46
[6]   Three-dimensional ultrasound-assessed fetal thigh volumetry in predicting birth weight [J].
Chang, FM ;
Liang, RI ;
Ko, HC ;
Yao, BL ;
Chang, CH ;
Yu, CH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (03) :331-339
[7]  
COMBS CA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P365
[8]   Modified neonatal growth assessment score: A multivariate approach to the detection of intrauterine growth retardation in the neonate [J].
Deter, RL ;
Nazar, R ;
Milner, LL .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 6 (06) :400-410
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF LIMB CIRCUMFERENCES WITH 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND FOR FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION [J].
FAVRE, R ;
NISAND, G ;
BETTAHAR, K ;
GRANGE, G ;
NISAND, I .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 3 (03) :176-179
[10]   PROSPECTIVE-STUDY ON FETAL WEIGHT ESTIMATION USING LIMB CIRCUMFERENCES OBTAINED BY 3-DIMENSIONAL ULTRASOUND [J].
FAVRE, R ;
BADER, AM ;
NISAND, G .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 6 (02) :140-144