Preoperative diagnostics in pancreatic carcinoma: would less be better?

被引:13
作者
Bottger, T
Engelmann, R
Seifert, JK
Low, R
Junginger, T
机构
[1] Univ Mainz, Allgemein & Abdominalchirurg Klin & Poliklin, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Mainz, Dept Radiol, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
关键词
pancreatic carcinoma; diagnostics;
D O I
10.1007/s004230050126
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the value of preoperative diagnostics in patients with pancreatic carcinoma in terms of tumor diagnosis and evaluation of resectability. Patients/Methods. From 1 September 1985 to 31 December 1997, 408 patients shown by histology to have a ductal (n=330) or periampullary carcinoma (n=78) were treated at our hospital. Results: In determining the presence of tumor, ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) had a sensitivity of 88.3% and 94.0%, respectively; combined, they had a sensitivity of 96.2%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) had a sensitivity of 96.2%. Preoperative aspiration biopsy cytology had a sensitivity of 71.4%. No correlation was found in the patients undergoing surgery between the preoperative level of serum CA 19-9 and the presence of distant metastases. Tumor infiltration of the portal vein was shown with a sensitivity of 33.3%, 24.3%, and 76.5% and a specificity of 93.9%, 98.9%, and 65.6% by ultrasonography, CT, and angiography, respectively. Ultrasonography and CT detected liver metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis with a sensitivity of 35.9% each and a specificity of 91.9% and 91.7%, respectively. Conclusion: This study shows that, in 96% of patients with pancreatic carcinoma, ultrasonography and CT are adequate for diagnosis and for the evaluation of resectability. ERCP is not the method of choice in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma due to its invasiveness and to the fact that it fails to demonstrate the pathological anatomical location of the tumor; it should only be used if a tumor is suspected despite negative results on ultrasonography and CT or as an additional diagnostic method to differentiate between chronic pancreatitis and carcinoma. On account of the low sensitivity of percutaneous aspiration biopsy cytology, this method is not necessary preoperatively and may even lead to the spread of tumor cells. In 7% of patients, routine laparoscopy would additionally show liver metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis not demonstrated using the imaging techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 248
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] PREOPERATIVE VISCERAL ANGIOGRAPHY ALTERS INTRAOPERATIVE STRATEGY DURING THE WHIPPLE PROCEDURE
    BIEHL, TR
    TRAVERSO, LW
    HAUPTMANN, E
    RYAN, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (05) : 607 - 612
  • [2] PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS - HOW USEFUL IS EVALUATION WITH US
    CAMPBELL, JP
    WILSON, SR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (02) : 341 - 344
  • [3] CARTER DC, 1992, SURGERY, V111, P602
  • [4] PANCREATIC-CANCER VERSUS CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS - DIAGNOSIS WITH CA 19-9 ASSESSMENT, US, CT, AND CT-GUIDED FINE-NEEDLE BIOPSY
    DELMASCHIO, A
    VANZULLI, A
    SIRONI, S
    CASTRUCCI, M
    MELLONE, R
    STAUDACHER, C
    CARLUCCI, M
    ZERBI, A
    PAROLINI, D
    FARAVELLI, A
    CANTABONI, A
    GARANCINI, P
    DICARLO, V
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (01) : 95 - 99
  • [5] IS PREOPERATIVE ANGIOGRAPHY USEFUL IN PATIENTS WITH PERIAMPULLARY TUMORS
    DOOLEY, WC
    CAMERON, JL
    PITT, HA
    LILLEMOE, KD
    YUE, NC
    VENBRUX, AC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1990, 211 (06) : 649 - 655
  • [6] PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA - DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING WITH DYNAMIC CT
    FREENY, PC
    MARKS, WM
    RYAN, JA
    TRAVERSO, LW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (01) : 125 - 133
  • [7] GOLD EB, 1993, CANCER, V328, P1484
  • [8] DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH CT, DELAYED CT, CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY, AND MR IMAGING
    HEIKEN, JP
    WEYMAN, PJ
    LEE, JKT
    BALFE, DM
    PICUS, D
    BRUNT, EM
    FLYE, MW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [9] LEE YTN, 1982, CANCER, V49, P1035, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19820301)49:5<1035::AID-CNCR2820490530>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-1