Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1

被引:88
作者
Hughes, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, Mueller Lab 208, University Pk, PA 16803 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Inst Mol Evolutionary Genet, University Pk, PA 16803 USA
关键词
adaptive evolution; gene duplication; genome structure; major histocompatibility complex;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025990
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There are 10 gene families that have members on both human chromosome 6 (6p21.3, the location of the human major histocompatibility complex [MHC]) and human chromosome 9 (mostly 9q33-34). Six of these families also have members on mouse chromosome 17 (the mouse MHC chromosome) and mouse chromosome 2. In addition, four of these families have members on human chromosome 1 (1q21-25 and 1p13), and two of these have members on mouse chromosome I. One hypothesis to explain these patterns is that members of the 10 gene families of human chromosomes 6 and 9 were duplicated simultaneously as a result of polyploidization or duplication of a chromosome segment ("block duplication"). A subsequent block duplication has been proposed to account for the presence of representatives of four of these families on human chromosome 1. Phylogenetic analyses of the 9 gene families for which data were available decisively rejected the hypothesis of block duplication as an overall explanation of these patterns. Three to five of the genes on human chromosomes 6 and 9 probably duplicated simultaneously early in vertebrate history, prior to the divergence of jawed and jawless vertebrates, and shortly after that, all four of the genes on chromosomes 1 and 9 probably duplicated as a block. However, the other genes duplicated at different times scattered over at least 1.6 billion years. Since the occurrence of these clusters of related genes cannot be explained by block duplication, one alternative explanation is that they cluster together because of shared functional characteristics relating to expression patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 870
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
AYAD S, 1994, EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX
[2]   CLONING OF A NEW FINGER PROTEIN GENE (ZNF173) WITHIN THE CLASS-I REGION OF THE HUMAN MHC [J].
CHU, TW ;
CAPOSSELA, A ;
COLEMAN, R ;
GOEI, VL ;
NALLUR, G ;
GRUEN, JR .
GENOMICS, 1995, 29 (01) :229-239
[3]   SSC1, AN ESSENTIAL MEMBER OF THE YEAST HSP70 MULTIGENE FAMILY, ENCODES A MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN [J].
CRAIG, EA ;
KRAMER, J ;
SHILLING, J ;
WERNERWASHBURNE, M ;
HOLMES, S ;
KOSICSMITHERS, J ;
NICOLET, CM .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1989, 9 (07) :3000-3008
[4]  
Dobner T, 1991, DNA Seq, V1, P409, DOI 10.3109/10425179109020799
[5]  
DOOLITTLE FF, 1989, PREDICTION PROTEIN S, P599
[6]  
EICK S, 1989, EUR J CELL BIOL, V49, P110
[7]   THE NODI GENE-PRODUCT OF RHIZOBIUM-LEGUMINOSARUM IS CLOSELY RELATED TO ATP-BINDING BACTERIAL TRANSPORT PROTEINS - NUCLEOTIDE-SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF THE NODI AND NODJ GENES [J].
EVANS, IJ ;
DOWNIE, JA .
GENE, 1986, 43 (1-2) :95-101
[8]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
[9]   Fugu genome is not a good mammalian model [J].
Gilley, J ;
Armes, N ;
Fried, M .
NATURE, 1997, 385 (6614) :305-306
[10]   SPANDRELS OF SAN-MARCO AND THE PANGLOSSIAN PARADIGM - A CRITIQUE OF THE ADAPTATIONIST PROGRAM [J].
GOULD, SJ ;
LEWONTIN, RC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1979, 205 (1161) :581-598