Numerical comparison of Augmented Lagrangian algorithms for nonconvex problems

被引:98
作者
Birgin, EG
Castillo, RA
Martínez, JM
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Comp Sci IME USP, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado, Dept Math, Barquisimeto, Venezuela
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, IMECC, Dept Appl Math, BR-13081970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
nonlinear programming; Augmented Lagrangian methods; inequality constraints; benchmarking; algorithms;
D O I
10.1007/s10589-005-1066-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Augmented Lagrangian algorithms are very popular tools for solving nonlinear programming problems. At each outer iteration of these methods a simpler optimization problem is solved, for which efficient algorithms can be used, especially when the problems are large. The most famous Augmented Lagrangian algorithm for minimization with inequality constraints is known as Powell-Hestenes-Rockafellar (PHR) method. The main drawback of PHR is that the objective function of the subproblems is not twice continuously differentiable. This is the main motivation for the introduction of many alternative Augmented Lagrangian methods. Most of them have interesting interpretations as proximal point methods for solving the dual problem, when the original nonlinear programming problem is convex. In this paper a numerical comparison between many of these methods is performed using all the suitable problems of the CUTE collection.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 55
页数:25
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   AN ALGORITHM FOR SOLVING NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS SUBJECT TO NONLINEAR INEQUALITY CONSTRAINTS [J].
ALLRAN, RR ;
JOHNSEN, SEJ .
COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1970, 13 (02) :171-&
[2]   Interior proximal and multiplier methods based on second order homogeneous kernels [J].
Auslender, A ;
Teboulle, M ;
Ben-Tiba, S .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1999, 24 (03) :645-668
[3]   Penalty/barrier multiplier methods for convex programming problems [J].
BenTal, A ;
Zibulevsky, M .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 7 (02) :347-366
[4]  
BENTAL A, 1992, 992 TECHN FAC IND EN
[5]  
Bertsekas D., 1999, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
[6]  
Bertsekas D., 2019, Reinforcement Learning and Optimal Control
[7]   Nonmonotone spectral projected gradient methods on convex sets [J].
Birgin, EG ;
Martínez, JM ;
Raydan, M .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2000, 10 (04) :1196-1211
[8]   Large-scale active-set box-constrained optimization method with spectral projected gradients [J].
Birgin, EG ;
Martínez, JM .
COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2002, 23 (01) :101-125
[9]   Algorithm 813:: SPG -: Software for convex-constrained optimization [J].
Birgin, EG ;
Martínez, JM ;
Raydan, M .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2001, 27 (03) :340-349
[10]  
Castillo R. A., 1998, THESIS U FEDERAL RIO