Carotid endarterectomy remains the standard of care, even in high-risk surgical patients

被引:53
作者
Boules, TN [1 ]
Proctor, MC [1 ]
Aref, A [1 ]
Upchurch, GR [1 ]
Stanley, JC [1 ]
Henke, PK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Vasc Surg Sect, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000150270.86267.29
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study tested the hypothesis that high-risk patients can undergo carotid endarterectomy without associated increased risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or death. Summary Background Data: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has clearly been shown to be effective in reducing the risk of stroke in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with extracranial carotid stenosis. However, recently, carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS) has been suggested as an alternative treatment in high-risk surgical patients. Methods: Medical records for consecutive patients who underwent CEA from 1996 to 2001 were reviewed for demographics, medical history, and hospital course. High-risk patients were defined as those experiencing a myocardial infarction (MI) or an exacerbation of congestive heart failure (CHF) within 4 weeks before CEA; unstable angina; steroid-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); prior ipsilateral CEA, neck dissection or irradiation; high carotid bifurcation; and those with combined cardiac-carotid procedures. Poor postoperative outcome was defined as stroke, TIA, or death within 30 days. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used as appropriate. Results: Four hundred twenty-nine patients underwent 499 CEAs, of which 84 (17%) were considered high risk. The overall stroke-death rate among all patients was 2.8%. A total of 11 postoperative strokes (2.2%), 7 TIAs (1.4%), and 3 deaths (0.6%) occurred within 30 days after surgery. There was no difference in 30-day poor outcome between high- and low-risk patients (4.8% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.77). When these risk factors were assessed independently, those with recent MI were at higher risk for poor outcome (odds ratio [OR], 13.3; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 2.2-82.0; P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis also revealed that a history of contralateral stroke or TIA conferred an increased risk of poor outcome (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.4; P = 0.02), whereas use of preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was associated with reduced risk (OR, 0.36; 95% Cl, 0.11-1.0; P = 0.05), as was a history of hyperlipidemia (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.87; P = 0.03). By log-rank analysis, 12-month survival was significantly worse in the high-risk group as compared with the low-risk (96% vs. 91%, P = 0.03). Conclusions: Patients considered a surgical high risk can undergo CEA without any worse outcome compared with those patients deemed low risk. The benefit of CAS will likely be marginal, and only controlled clinical trials will be able to determine if certain subgroups demonstrate improved outcome with CAS. Carotid endarterectomy remains the standard of care, even in high-risk surgical patients.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 363
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Alberts MJ, 2001, STROKE, V32, P325
  • [2] Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis
    Barnett, HJM
    Taylor, W
    Eliasziw, M
    Fox, AJ
    Ferguson, GG
    Haynes, RB
    Rankin, RN
    Clagett, GP
    Hachinski, VC
    Sackett, DL
    Thorpe, KE
    Meldrum, HE
    Spence, JD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (20) : 1415 - 1425
  • [3] Carotid stenting and angioplasty - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association
    Bettmann, MA
    Katzen, BT
    Whisnant, J
    Brant-Zawadzki, M
    Broderick, JP
    Furlan, AJ
    Hershey, LA
    Howard, V
    Kuntz, R
    Loftus, CM
    Pearce, W
    Roberts, A
    Roubin, G
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1998, 97 (01) : 121 - 123
  • [4] The vulnerable plaque and acute coronary syndromes
    Corti, R
    Farkouh, ME
    Badimon, JJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 113 (08) : 668 - 680
  • [5] Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: An effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume
    Cowan, JA
    Dimick, JB
    Thompson, BG
    Stanley, JC
    Upchurch, GR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2002, 195 (06) : 814 - 821
  • [6] ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery - Executive summary - A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to update the 1996 guidelines on pedoperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac, surgery)
    Eagle, KA
    Berger, PB
    Calkins, H
    Chaitman, BR
    Ewy, GA
    Fleischmann, KE
    Fleisher, LA
    Froehlich, JB
    Gusberg, RJ
    Leppo, JA
    Ryan, T
    Schlant, RC
    Winters, WL
    Gibbons, RJ
    Antman, EM
    Alpert, JS
    Faxon, DP
    Fuster, V
    Gregoratos, G
    Jacobs, AK
    Hiratzka, LF
    Russell, RO
    Smith, SC
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (05) : 1052 - 1064
  • [7] Friedell ML, 2001, ANN VASC SURG, V15, P13
  • [8] High-risk carotid endarterectomy: Fact or fiction
    Gasparis, AP
    Ricotta, L
    Cuadra, SA
    Char, DJ
    Purtill, WA
    Van Bemmelen, PS
    Hines, GL
    Giron, F
    Ricotta, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [9] Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis
    Goldstein, LB
    Samsa, GP
    Matchar, DB
    Oddone, EZ
    [J]. STROKE, 1998, 29 (04) : 750 - 753
  • [10] Gross C. Michael, 1999, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, V82, P176