Relationship between severity of reflux esophagitis according to the Los Angeles classification and esophageal motility

被引:53
作者
Sugiura, T [1 ]
Iwakiri, K [1 ]
Kotoyori, M [1 ]
Kobayashi, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Nippon Med Sch, Dept Internal Med 3, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138603, Japan
关键词
reflux esophagitis; Los Angeles classification; lower esophageal sphincter; esophageal contraction; esophageal motility;
D O I
10.1007/s005350170107
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose. We investigated the relationship between the severity of reflux esophagitis (RE! according to the Los Angeles (LA) classification and esophageal motility. Methods. We examined 28 healthy subjects (HS) and 48 RE patients (grade A of the LA classification, 16 patients; grade B, 16 patients, grade C or D, 16 patients). Esophageal manometry was performed by the intraluminal microtransducer method. Resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was assessed by the rapid pull-through method. Esophageal contraction after ten repeated 5-ml water swallowings separated by 30-s intervals was measured at 3, 8, 13, and 18 cm above the LES. Results, The resting LES pressure and the amplitude of esophageal contraction 3 cm above the LES in the grades C + D group were significantly lower than these in the HS group. The amplitude of esophageal contraction 3 cm above the LES in the grade B group was significantly lower than these in the grade A group and the HS group. The frequency of failed peristalsis in the grades C + D group was significantly higher than that in the HS group and the grade A and grade B groups. Conclusions. The present findings suggested that the severity of RE according to the LA classification would be likely to mainly reflect esophageal volume clearance.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: A progress report on observer agreement [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Bennett, JR ;
Blum, AL ;
Dent, J ;
deDombal, FT ;
Galmiche, JP ;
Lundell, L ;
Margulies, M ;
Richter, JE ;
Spechler, SJ ;
Tytgat, GNJ ;
Wallin, L .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 111 (01) :85-92
[2]  
ARMSTRONG D, 1991, GULLET, V1, P63
[3]   COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE AND CIMETIDINE IN REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - SYMPTOMATIC, ENDOSCOPIC, AND HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATIONS [J].
BATE, CM ;
KEELING, PWN ;
OMORAIN, C ;
WILKINSON, SP ;
FOSTER, DN ;
MOUNTFORD, RA ;
TEMPERLEY, JM ;
HARVEY, RF ;
THOMPSON, DG ;
DAVIS, M ;
FORGACS, IC ;
BASSETT, KS ;
RICHARDSON, PDI .
GUT, 1990, 31 (09) :968-972
[4]   MECHANISMS OF LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER INCOMPETENCE IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX [J].
DENT, J ;
HOLLOWAY, RH ;
TOOULI, J ;
DODDS, WJ .
GUT, 1988, 29 (08) :1020-1028
[5]   DOES HEALING OF ESOPHAGITIS IMPROVE ESOPHAGEAL MOTOR FUNCTION [J].
ECKARDT, VF .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1988, 33 (02) :161-165
[6]  
FUCHS KH, 1987, SURGERY, V102, P575
[7]  
HELM JF, 1983, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V85, P607
[8]   EFFECT OF ESOPHAGEAL EMPTYING AND SALIVA ON CLEARANCE OF ACID FROM THE ESOPHAGUS [J].
HELM, JF ;
DODDS, WJ ;
PELC, LR ;
PALMER, DW ;
HOGAN, WJ ;
TEETER, BC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (05) :284-288
[9]  
HOLLOWAY RH, 1990, GASTROENTEROL CLIN N, V19, P517
[10]   ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALTIC DYSFUNCTION IN PEPTIC ESOPHAGITIS [J].
KAHRILAS, PJ ;
DODDS, WJ ;
HOGAN, WJ ;
KERN, M ;
ARNDORFER, RC ;
REECE, A .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 91 (04) :897-904