A prospective longitudinal evaluation of quality of life after abdominoperineal resection

Objective: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is a disfiguring procedure, frequently associated with significant urogenital dysfunction. The aim of this prospective study was to repeatedly assess quality of life (QoL) 1, 6, and 12 months after APR. Methods: Twenty patients who underwent APR between June 2002 and September 2005 were considered for analysis. QoL was assessed using two self-rating validated questionnaires developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Results: All patients were free of recurrence at time of last interview. At I-year follow-up patients reported significant improvement in global QoL [scores: 53 +/- 23 (1 month) vs. 70 +/- 15 (1 year), P = 0.01], and physical function (74 +/- 16 vs. 91 +/- 12, P = 0.001). Patients also reported significant improvement in symptoms such as fatigue (39 +/- 30 vs. 15 +/- 19, P = 0.01); and pain (33 31 vs. 10 14, P = 0.01). By contrast, there was no improvement at I year for the following items: body image (75 +/- 33 vs. 75 +/- 30, P = 0.99), sexual dysfunction (10 +/- 21 vs. 21 +/- 27, P = 0.40); and stoma-related problems (19 +/- 14 vs. 11 +/- 28, P = 0.34). Conclusion: One year after APR, patients demonstrated significant improvement in global QoL and tumor-related symptoms, while body image remained significantly altered. Similarly, treatment-related side effects did not improve over the time period considered.