Optimal Pancreatic Surgery Are We Making Progress in North America?

被引:57
作者
Beane, Joal D. [1 ]
Borrebach, Jeffrey D. [1 ]
Zureikat, Amer H. [1 ]
Kilbane, E. Molly [2 ]
Thompson, Vanessa M. [3 ]
Pitt, Henry A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Amer Coll Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Temple Univ, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
distal pancreatectomy; optimal; pancreatectomy; pancreatoduodenectomy; quality; COMPOSITE MEASURES; ACS-NSQIP; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; RESECTION; OUTCOMES; RISK; CONVERSION; MORTALITY; STANDARD; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003628
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Our aims were to assess North American trends in the management of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), and to quantify the delivery of optimal pancreatic surgery. Background: Morbidity after pancreatectomy remains unacceptably high. Recent literature suggests that composite measures may more accurately define surgical quality. Methods: The 2013 to 2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files were queried to identify patients undergoing PD (N = 16,222) and DP (N = 7946). Patient, process, procedure, and 30-day postoperative outcome variables were analyzed over time. Optimal pancreatic surgery was defined as the absence of postoperative mortality, serious morbidity, percutaneous drainage, and reoperation while achieving a length of stay equal to or less than the 75th percentile (12 days for PD and 7 days for DP) with no readmissions. Risk-adjusted time-trend analyses were performed using logistic regression, and the threshold for statistical significance was P <= 0.05. Results: The use of minimally invasive PD did not change over time, but robotic PD increased (2.5 to 4.2%; P < 0.001) and laparoscopic PD decreased (5.8% to 4.3%; P < 0.02). Operative times decreased (P < 0.05) and fewer transfusions were administered (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with a drain fluid amylase checked on postoperative day 1 increased (P < 0.001), and a greater percentage of surgical drains were removed by postoperative day 3 (P < 0.001). Overall morbidity (P < 0.02), mortality (P < 0.05), and postoperative length of stay (P = 0.002) decreased. Finally, the rate of optimal pancreatic surgery increased for PD (53.7% to 56.9%; P < 0.01) and DP (53.3% to 58.5%; P < 0.001), and alspo for patients with pancreatic cancer (P < 0.01). Conclusions: From 2013 to 2017, pre, intra, and perioperative pancreatectomy processes have evolved, and multiple postoperative outcomes have improved. Thus, in 4 years, optimal pancreatic surgery in North America has increased by 3% to 5%.
引用
收藏
页码:E355 / E363
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Improved Outcomes in 394 Pancreatic Cancer Resections: the Impact of Enhanced Recovery Pathway
    Agarwal, Vandana
    Thomas, Martin Jose
    Joshi, Riddhi
    Chaudhari, Vikram
    Bhandare, Manish
    Mitra, Abhishek
    deSouza, Ashwin
    Ambulkar, Reshma
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (10) : 1732 - 1742
  • [2] American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, 2018, US GUID 2017 ACS NSQ
  • [3] The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After
    Bassi, Claudio
    Marchegiani, Giovanni
    Dervenis, Christos
    Sarr, Micheal
    Abu Hilal, Mohammad
    Adham, Mustapha
    Allen, Peter
    Andersson, Roland
    Asbun, Horacio J.
    Besselink, Marc G.
    Conlon, Kevin
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Falconi, Massimo
    Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano
    Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos
    Fingerhut, Abe
    Friess, Helmut
    Gouma, Dirk J.
    Hackert, Thilo
    Izbicki, Jakob
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Olah, Attila
    Schulick, Richard
    Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
    Takada, Tadahiro
    Takaori, Kyoichi
    Traverso, William
    Vollmer, Charles
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Yeo, Charles J.
    Salvia, Roberto
    Buehler, Marcus
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [4] Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bassi, Claudio
    Molinari, Enrico
    Malleo, Giuseppe
    Crippa, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    Salvia, Roberto
    Talamini, Giorgio
    Pederzoli, Paolo
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [5] Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection: Outcomes and learning curve
    Beane, Joal D.
    Zenati, Mazen
    Hamad, Ahmad
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    Zeh, Herbert J., III
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    [J]. SURGERY, 2019, 166 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [6] Variation in Drain Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy Early Versus Delayed Removal
    Beane, Joal D.
    House, Michael G.
    Ceppa, Eugene P.
    Dolejs, Scott C.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (04) : 718 - 724
  • [7] Assessing the impact of conversion on outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy
    Beane, Joal D.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Dolejs, Scott C.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    [J]. HPB, 2018, 20 (04) : 356 - 363
  • [8] Pancreatoduodenectomy with venous or arterial resection: a NSQIP propensity score analysis
    Beane, Joal D.
    House, Michael G.
    Pitt, Susan C.
    Zarzaur, Ben
    Kilbane, E. Molly
    Hall, Bruce L.
    Riall, Taylor S.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    [J]. HPB, 2017, 19 (03) : 254 - 263
  • [9] Fast track-different implications in pancreatic surgery
    Berberat, P. O.
    Ingold, H.
    Gulbinas, A.
    Kleeff, J.
    Mueller, M. W.
    Gutt, C.
    Weigand, M.
    Friess, H.
    Buechler, M. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2007, 11 (07) : 880 - 887
  • [10] Patient selection and the volume effect in pancreatic surgery: unequal benefits?
    Bliss, Lindsay A.
    Yang, Catherine J.
    Chau, Zeling
    Ng, Sing Chau
    McFadden, David W.
    Kent, Tara S.
    Moser, A. James
    Callery, Mark P.
    Tseng, Jennifer F.
    [J]. HPB, 2014, 16 (10) : 899 - 906