Detection of maximum loadability limits and weak buses using Chaotic PSO considering security constraints

被引:15
作者
Acharjee, P. [1 ]
Mallick, S. [1 ]
Thakur, S. S. [1 ]
Ghoshal, S. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Durgapur 713209, India
关键词
PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; POWER-FLOW; DISPATCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.chaos.2011.05.008
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In the current research chaotic search is used with the optimization technique for solving non-linear complicated power system problems because Chaos can overcome the local optima problem of optimization technique. Power system problem, more specifically voltage stability, is one of the practical examples of non-linear, complex, convex problems. Smart grid, restructured energy system and socio-economic development fetch various uncertain events in power systems and the level of uncertainty increases to a great extent day by day. In this context, analysis of voltage stability is essential. The efficient method to assess the voltage stability is maximum loadability limit (MLL). MLL problem is formulated as a maximization problem considering practical security constraints (SCs). Detection of weak buses is also important for the analysis of power system stability. Both MLL and weak buses are identified by PSO methods and FACTS devices can be applied to the detected weak buses for the improvement of stability. Three particle swarm optimization (PSO) techniques namely General PSO (GPSO), Adaptive PSO (APSO) and Chaotic PSO (CPSO) are presented for the comparative study with obtaining MLL and weak buses under different SCs. In APSO method, PSO-parameters are made adaptive with the problem and chaos is incorporated in CPSO method to obtain reliable convergence and better performances. All three methods are applied on standard IEEE 14 bus, 30 bus, 57 bus and 118 bus test systems to show their comparative computing effectiveness and optimization efficiencies. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 612
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Optimal design of power-system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization [J].
Abido, MA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2002, 17 (03) :406-413
[2]   Chaotic particle swarm optimization based robust load flow [J].
Acharjee, P. ;
Goswami, S. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2010, 32 (02) :141-146
[3]   Expert algorithm based on adaptive particle swarm optimization for power flow analysis [J].
Acharjee, P. ;
Goswami, S. K. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :5151-5156
[4]   THE CONTINUATION POWER FLOW - A TOOL FOR STEADY-STATE VOLTAGE STABILITY ANALYSIS [J].
AJJARAPU, V ;
CHRISTY, C .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1992, 7 (01) :416-423
[5]   Chaos embedded particle swarm optimization algorithms [J].
Alatas, Bilal ;
Akin, Erhan ;
Ozer, A. Bedri .
CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2009, 40 (04) :1715-1734
[6]   Tracking of Thevenin equivalent parameters on weak voltage load bus groups [J].
An, Tianyu ;
Zhou, Suquan ;
Yu, Jilai ;
Zhang, Yanjun .
2006 IEEE/PES POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION. VOLS 1-5, 2006, :1570-+
[7]   Chaotic particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch considering the generator constraints [J].
Cai Jiejin ;
Ma Xiaoqian ;
Li Lixiang ;
Peng Haipeng .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 48 (02) :645-653
[8]  
CHUANWEN J, 2005, MATH COMPUT SIMULAT, V68, P57
[9]   A quantum particle swarm optimizer with chaotic mutation operator [J].
Coelho, Leandro dos Santos .
CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2008, 37 (05) :1409-1418
[10]   Model-free adaptive control optimization using a chaotic particle swarm approach [J].
Coelho, Leandro dos Santos ;
Rodrigues Coelho, Antonio Augusto .
CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2009, 41 (04) :2001-2009