Social support and hostility interact to influence clinic, work, and home blood pressure in Black and White men and women

被引:32
作者
Brownley, KA
Light, KC
Anderson, NB
机构
[1] UNIV N CAROLINA, DEPT PSYCHIAT, CHAPEL HILL, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIH, OFF BEHAV & SOCIAL SCI RES, BETHESDA, MD 20892 USA
关键词
hostility; social support; ambulatory blood pressure; anger; gender; ethnicity;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01069.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The effects of hostility and social support on clinic, work, and home systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures were evaluated in 129 healthy adults. High hostility was related to higher SBP and DBP in Whites; low hostility was related to higher SBP and DBP in Blacks. These relationships were significant for men at home and at work and for women at screening. The relationship between low hostility and higher BP in Blacks was largely due to Black men who reported low hostility plus high anger-in (suggesting suppressed hostility). In contrast, high hostile Black men with high tangible support tended to exhibit lower BP than all other Black men. In White women, high belonging support was related to lower BP, independent of hostility, and low tangible support plus high hostility was related to higher clinic BP. In high hostile subjects, regardless of ethnicity or gender, high appraisal support was related to lower overall BP. These data suggest that the adverse BP effects of hostility and the beneficial effects of social support interact in a complex manner, reflecting contextual, ethnic, and gender specificities.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 445
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   RACIAL-DIFFERENCES IN STRESS-INDUCED CARDIOVASCULAR REACTIVITY AND HYPERTENSION - CURRENT STATUS AND SUBSTANTIVE ISSUES [J].
ANDERSON, NB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (01) :89-105
[2]   RELATIONSHIP OF RACIAL STRESSORS TO BLOOD-PRESSURE RESPONSES AND ANGER EXPRESSION IN BLACK-COLLEGE STUDENTS [J].
ARMSTEAD, CA ;
LAWLER, KA ;
GORDEN, G ;
CROSS, J ;
GIBBONS, J .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 8 (05) :541-556
[3]  
BAER PE, 1979, PSYCHOSOM MED, V43, P321
[4]  
BAREFOOT JC, 1992, HOSTILITY, COPING & HEALTH, P13, DOI 10.1037/10105-001
[5]   HOSTILITY PATTERNS AND HEALTH IMPLICATIONS - CORRELATES OF COOK-MEDLEY HOSTILITY SCALE SCORES IN A NATIONAL SURVEY [J].
BAREFOOT, JC ;
PETERSON, BL ;
DAHLSTROM, WG ;
SIEGLER, IC ;
ANDERSON, NB ;
WILLIAMS, RB .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 10 (01) :18-24
[6]   HOSTILITY, CHD INCIDENCE, AND TOTAL MORTALITY - A 25-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY OF 255 PHYSICIANS [J].
BAREFOOT, JC ;
DAHLSTROM, WG ;
WILLIAMS, RB .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1983, 45 (01) :59-63
[7]  
Berkman L. F., 1985, SOCIAL SUPPORT HLTH, P241
[8]   EMOTIONAL SUPPORT AND SURVIVAL AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A PROSPECTIVE, POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF THE ELDERLY [J].
BERKMAN, LF ;
LEOSUMMERS, L ;
HORWITZ, RI .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 117 (12) :1003-1009
[9]   CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPERSONAL SUPPORT EVALUATION LIST [J].
BROOKINGS, JB ;
BOLTON, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 16 (01) :137-147
[10]   AN INVENTORY FOR ASSESSING DIFFERENT KINDS OF HOSTILITY [J].
BUSS, AH ;
DURKEE, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1957, 21 (04) :343-349