Antihypertensive drugs and risk of cancer: network meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of 324168 participants from randomised trials

被引:314
作者
Bangalore, Sripal [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [2 ]
Kjeldsen, Sverre E. [5 ]
Makani, Harikrishna [3 ,4 ]
Grossman, Ehud [6 ]
Wetterslev, Jorn [7 ]
Gupta, Ajay K. [8 ]
Sever, Peter S. [8 ]
Gluud, Christian [7 ]
Messerli, Franz H. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Cardiac Catheterizat Lab, Leon H Charney Div Cardiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[3] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, New York, NY 10025 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Oslo, Ullevaal Hosp, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[6] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[7] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[8] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
关键词
ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING-ENZYME; VENTRICULAR SYSTOLIC FUNCTION; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; NORMAL BLOOD-PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS; DIABETIC-NEPHROPATHY;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70260-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background The risk of cancer from antihypertensive drugs has been much debated, with a recent analysis showing increased risk with angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs). We assessed the association between antihypertensive drugs and cancer risk in a comprehensive analysis of data from randomised clinical trials. Methods We undertook traditional direct comparison meta-analyses, multiple comparisons (network) meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1950, to August, 2010, for randomised clinical trials of antihypertensive therapy (ARBs, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors [ACEi], beta blockers, calcium-channel blockers [CCBs], or diuretics) with follow-up of at least 1 year. Our primary outcomes were cancer and cancer-related deaths. Findings We identified 70 randomised controlled trials (148 comparator groups) with 324168 participants. In the network meta-analysis (fixed-effect model), we recorded no difference in the risk of cancer with ARBs (proportion with cancer 2.04%; odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.93-1.09), ACEi (2.03%; 1.00, 0.92-1.09), beta blockers (1.97%; 0.97, 0.88-1.07), CCBs (2.11%; 1.05, 0.96-1.13), diuretics (2.02%; 1.00, 0.90-1.11), or other controls (1.95%, 0.97, 0.74-1.24) versus placebo (2.02%). There was an increased risk with the combination of ACEi plus ARBs (2.30%, 1.14, 1.02-1.28); however, this risk was not apparent in the random-effects model (odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI 0.92-1.38). No differences were detected in cancer-related mortality for ARBs (death rate 1.33%; odds ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.15), ACEi (1.25%; 0.95, 0.81-1.10), beta blockers (1.23%; 0.93, 0.80-1.08), CCBs (1.27%; 096, 0.82-1.11), diuretics (1.30%; 0.98, 0.84-1.13), other controls (1.43%; 1.08, 0.78-1.46), and ACEi plus ARBs (1.45%; 1.10, 0.90-1.32). In direct comparison meta-analyses, similar results were recorded for all antihypertensive classes, except for an increased risk of cancer with ACEi and ARB combination (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.24; p=0.004) and with CCBs (1.06, 1.01-1.12; p=0.02). However, we noted no significant differences in cancer-related mortality. On the basis of trial sequential analysis, our results suggest no evidence of even a 5-10% relative risk (RR) increase of cancer and cancer-related deaths with any individual class of antihypertensive drugs studied. However, for the ACEi and ARB combination, the cumulative Z curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary, suggesting firm evidence for at least a 10% RR increase in cancer risk. Interpretation Our analysis refutes a 5.0-10.0% relative increase in the risk of cancer or cancer-related death with the use of ARBs, ACEi, beta blockers, diuretics, and CCBs. However, increased risk of cancer with the combination of ACEi and ARBs cannot be ruled out.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 82
页数:18
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1995, Hypertens Res, V18, P235
[2]
[Anonymous], 1974, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V229, P409
[3]
[Anonymous], 2000 M DOC CARD REN
[4]
[Anonymous], 21283S011 NDA CTR DR
[5]
[Anonymous], LANCET
[6]
[Anonymous], 20386 NDA S
[7]
[Anonymous], NOVARTIS DIOVAN VALS
[8]
[Anonymous], 1998, STATA TECHNICAL B RE
[9]
Perioperative β blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis [J].
Bangalore, Sripal ;
Wetterslev, Jorn ;
Pranesh, Shruthi ;
Sawhney, Sabrina ;
Gluud, Christian ;
Messerli, Franz H. .
LANCET, 2008, 372 (9654) :1962-1976
[10]
Cardiovascular outcomes in the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial of patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy [J].
Berl, T ;
Hunsicker, LG ;
Lewis, JB ;
Pfeffer, MA ;
Porush, JG ;
Rouleau, JL ;
Drury, PL ;
Esmatjes, E ;
Hricik, D ;
Parikh, CR ;
Raz, I ;
Vanhille, P ;
Wiegmann, TB ;
Wolfe, BM ;
Locatelli, F ;
Goldhaber, SZ ;
Lewis, EJ .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (07) :542-549