Temporal gap detection measured with multiple sinusoidal markers: Effects of marker number, frequency, and temporal position

被引:25
作者
Formby, C
Sherlock, LP
Li, S
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Otolaryngol HNS, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] AT&T Bell Labs, Middletown, NJ 07748 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.423313
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Detection thresholds were measured for silent temporal gaps within combinations of two, three, or four sinusoidal markers (i.e., combinations of one or two pre-gap markers with one or two post-gap markers). The markers were selected from the frequency range 2000-3100 Hz. Sinusoidal frequencies F-1 and F-4 Were used as pre-gap markers, while F-2 and F-3 served as pest-gap markers. Temporal gap detection (TGD) thresholds were measured from sets of three normal-hearing adults who tracked 70.7% correct detection thresholds adaptively across blocks of 50 two-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice trials. For symmetric marker conditions, when pre- and pest-gap markers were equivalent in frequency (e.g., F-1 = F-2 or F-1 = F-2 and F-3 = F-4), TGD thresholds were <10 ms. However, for asymmetric marker frequency alignments across the silent gap, including stimulus configurations where only three markers were presented on a trial (e.g., F-1 = F-2, F-2 not equal F-3, no F-4), performance was highly variable and was dramatically disrupted by the presentation of a second post-gap marker. The multiple-marker results reveal that TGD depends greatly on the number of markers presented, both in terms of the marker temporal position before and after the silent gap signal and the marker frequency alignment (symmetry) across the gap. These results, which cannot be predicted from models of the auditory periphery, may reflect perceptual mechanisms that are important in grouping and organizing auditory images. (C) 1998 Acoustical Society of America. [S0001-4966(98)04108-3].
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 998
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Albert S. Bregman, 1990, AUDITORY SCENE ANAL, P411, DOI [DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/1486.001.0001, 10.1121/1.408434, DOI 10.1121/1.408434]
[2]  
[Anonymous], SAS STAT US GUID VER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1967, Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfanger
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, CATEGORICAL PERCEPTI
[5]   AUDITORY ATTENTIONAL BANDWIDTH - EFFECT OF LEVEL AND FREQUENCY-RANGE [J].
BOTTE, MC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 98 (05) :2475-2485
[6]   PRIMARY AUDITORY STREAM SEGREGATION AND PERCEPTION OF ORDER IN RAPID SEQUENCES OF TONES [J].
BREGMAN, AS ;
CAMPBELL, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 89 (02) :244-&
[7]  
Bullock T. H., 1977, RECOGNITION COMPLEX
[8]   DETECTION OF A TEMPORAL GAP BETWEEN 2 DISPARATE STIMULI [J].
COLLYER, CE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :96-100
[9]   EFFECTIVE ATTENUATION OF SIGNALS IN NOISE UNDER FOCUSED ATTENTION [J].
DAI, HP ;
SCHARF, B ;
BUUS, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1991, 89 (06) :2837-2842
[10]   EFFECT OF SILENCE BETWEEN TONES ON AUDITORY STREAM SEGREGATION [J].
DANNENBRING, GL ;
BREGMAN, AS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1976, 59 (04) :987-989