Pap smear use in California: are we closing the racial/ethnic gap?

被引:49
作者
De Alba, I [1 ]
Ngo-Metzger, Q
Sweningson, JM
Hubbell, FA
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
cervical cancer; pap smear; race/ethnicity; screening;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Minority women continue to be disproportionately affected by cervical cancer. Minority population groups at high risk for cervical cancer may be failing to fully comply with screening recommendations. The use of Pap smears among women in California was evaluated to identify ethnic groups at higher risk for noncompliance with cervical cancer screening. Methods. Cross-sectional analysis of 2001 California Health Interview Survey data. Logistic regression was used to assess the independent contribution of race/ethnicity to the use of Pap smears. Results. Hispanic (aPR = 1.03, 95%CI 1.02-1.05) and Black (aPR = 1.03,95% Cl 1.001-1.06) women are more likely to report a Pap smear in the past 3 years as compared to White women. Asians were the least likely to report cervical cancer screening despite a more favorable sociodemographic profile. Screening rates varied among Hispanic or Asian subgroups; Mexicans, Vietnamese, Chinese, and South Asians are particularly underserved. Conclusions. In contrast to the country as a whole, Hispanic women in California are more likely to report a recent Pap smear as compared to White women. However, racial/ethnic disparities in Pap smear use persist; Asian women are the least likely to report cervical cancer screening as compared to any other group. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 755
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Preventive care - Female cancer screening, 1996-2000
    Adams, EK
    Florence, CS
    Thorpe, KE
    Becker, ER
    Joski, PJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 25 (04) : 301 - 307
  • [2] *AM CANC SOC, 2002, CANC PREV EARL DET F
  • [3] *AM CANC SOC CAL D, 1999, CAL CANC FACTS FIG
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Cancer screening in California: Radical and ethical disparities persist
  • [5] Armstrong L. R., 2002, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V51, P1067
  • [6] BERNER JS, 1987, J FAM PRACTICE, V24, P249
  • [7] Progress in cancer screening over a decade: Results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys
    Breen, N
    Wagener, DK
    Brown, ML
    Davis, WW
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (22) : 1704 - 1713
  • [8] BROWN F, 2003, STATE HLTH INSURANCE
  • [9] Buller D, 1998, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V9, P76
  • [10] *CAL HLTH INT SURV, 2002, CHIS 2001 METH SER