Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation

被引:140
作者
Jaervelae, Timo [1 ,2 ]
Moisala, Anna-Stina [3 ]
Sihvonen, Raine [1 ]
Jaervelae, Sally [1 ]
Kannus, Pekka [3 ,4 ]
Jaervinen, Markku [3 ]
机构
[1] Hatanpaa Hosp, Arthroscop Ctr, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ, Sports Clin & Hosp Mehilainen, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[3] Tampere Univ, Dept Trauma Musculoskeletal Surg & Rehabil, Div Orthopaed & Traumatol, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[4] UKK Inst, Injury & Osteoporosis Res Ctr, Tampere, Finland
关键词
double-bundle technique; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; hamstring tendon autograft; prospective; randomized; clinical outcome;
D O I
10.1177/0363546507308360
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Conventional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques have focused on restoration of the anteromedial bundle only, which, however, may be insufficient in restoring the rotational stability of the knee. Hypothesis: Rotational stability of the knee is better when using a double-bundle technique instead of a single-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Seventy-seven patients were randomized into 3 different groups for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: double-bundle with bioabsorbable screw fixation (n = 25), single-bundle with bioabsorbable screw fixation (n = 27), and single-bundle with metallic screw fixation (n = 25). The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometric measurement, and the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm knee scores. Results: There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. Seventy-three patients (95%) were available at a minimum 2-year follow-up (range, 24-35 mo). The rotational stability of the knee, as evaluated by the pivot-shift test, was the best in the patients in the double-bundle group. In addition, the patients in the single-bundle groups had more graft failures than those in the double-bundle group. Concerning the anterior stability of the knee as measured with the KT-1 000 arthrometer, the group differences were not statistically significant. No significant differences were found between the groups in knee scores. Conclusion: Rotational stability of the knee is better when using the double-bundle technique instead of the single-bundle technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 297
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament -: Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons [J].
Adachi, N ;
Ochi, M ;
Uchio, Y ;
Iwasa, J ;
Kuriwaka, M ;
Ito, Y .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (04) :515-520
[2]
Single- and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction [J].
Aglietti, Paolo ;
Giron, Francesco ;
Cuomo, Pierluigi ;
Losco, Michele ;
Mondanelli, Nicola .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (454) :108-113
[3]
FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT - FIBER BUNDLE ACTIONS RELATED TO LIGAMENT REPLACEMENTS AND INJURIES [J].
AMIS, AA ;
DAWKINS, GPC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (02) :260-267
[4]
Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An anatomic approach - art. no. E1 [J].
Cha, PS ;
Brucker, PU ;
West, RV ;
Zelle, BA ;
Yagi, M ;
Kurosaka, M ;
Fu, FH .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (10) :1275-1275
[5]
INSTRUMENTED MEASUREMENT OF ANTERIOR LAXITY OF THE KNEE [J].
DANIEL, DM ;
MALCOM, LL ;
LOSSE, G ;
STONE, ML ;
SACHS, R ;
BURKS, R .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (05) :720-726
[6]
Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Part II. Operative procedures and clinical correlations [J].
Fu, FH ;
Bennett, CH ;
Ma, CB ;
Menetrey, J ;
Lattermann, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (01) :124-130
[7]
Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction part 1: Biology and biomechanics of reconstruction [J].
Fu, FH ;
Bennett, CH ;
Lattermann, C ;
Ma, CB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (06) :821-830
[8]
Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads [J].
Gabriel, MT ;
Wong, EK ;
Woo, SLY ;
Yagi, M ;
Debski, RE .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2004, 22 (01) :85-89
[9]
GIRGIS FG, 1975, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P216
[10]
Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with EndoButton femoral fixation: A prospective study [J].
Hamada, M ;
Shino, K ;
Horibe, S ;
Mitsuoka, T ;
Miyama, T ;
Shiozaki, Y ;
Mae, T .
ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 17 (08) :801-807