A new method of examining relationships between individual difference measures and sensitive behavior criteria: Evaluating the unmatched count technique

被引:38
作者
Ahart, AM [1 ]
Sackett, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
randomized response; personality; counterproductivity; integrity; unmatched count technique;
D O I
10.1177/1094428103259557
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A method is introduced for estimating the relationship between individual difference measures and sensitive behavior criteria that offers respondents greater anonymity than direct self-report. This method uses the unmatched count technique (UCT), a form of a randomized response technique, for eliciting more candid responses regarding past engagement in counterproductive behaviors (CBs). Integrity, conscientiousness, and either UCT-obtained or self-reported CB data were obtained from undergraduates. Results failed to show stronger base rates for UCT-obtained base rates of CB criteria over direct self-report criteria. Mixed results were found regarding the relationships between integrity, conscientiousness, and UCT-obtained versus direct self-report CBs.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J BUSINESS PSYCHOL
[2]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[3]  
CUNNINGHAM MR, 1990, UNPUB EXPT INVESTIGA
[4]   USING THE UNMATCHED COUNT TECHNIQUE (UCT) TO ESTIMATE BASE RATES FOR SENSITIVE BEHAVIOR [J].
DALTON, DR ;
WIMBUSH, JC ;
DAILY, CM .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (04) :817-828
[5]  
FOX JA, 1986, RAMDOMIZED RESPONSE
[6]  
Goldberg L.R., 1999, Personality psychology in Europe, V7, P7
[7]  
Miller J.D., 1984, THESIS G WASHINGTON
[8]   COMPREHENSIVE METAANALYSIS OF INTEGRITY TEST VALIDITIES - FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONNEL-SELECTION AND THEORIES OF JOB-PERFORMANCE [J].
ONES, DS ;
VISWESVARAN, C ;
SCHMIDT, FL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (04) :679-703
[9]  
Sackett P.R., 2001, HDB IND WORK ORG PSY, V1, P145, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781848608320.N9
[10]   HONESTY TESTING FOR PERSONNEL-SELECTION - A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE [J].
SACKETT, PR ;
HARRIS, MM .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 37 (02) :221-245