ERCP and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy (ES): A Safe and Definitive Management of Gallstone Pancreatitis with the Gallbladder Left In Situ

被引:15
作者
Bignell, Mark [1 ]
Dearing, Matthew [1 ]
Hindmarsh, Andrew [1 ]
Rhodes, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Norfolk & Norwich Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Norwich NR1 3SR, Norfolk, England
关键词
Cholecystectomy; Pancreatitis; Gallstones; ERCP and ES; ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; INTERVAL CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-011-1729-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background and Aims UK guidelines recommend that patients with gallstone pancreatitis have cholecystectomy within 2 weeks of their pancreatitis. A proportion of these are elderly with significant comorbidities rendering them high risk for general anaesthesia and surgery. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) may offer a safe alternative to cholecystectomy as definitive treatment in these patients. Patients and Methods A retrospective review of all cases of gallstone pancreatitis presenting between 1999 and 2009 was undertaken. Results One hundred one patients underwent ERCP and ES as a definitive treatment for gallstone pancreatitis with a median age of 78 years (range, 43-96 years) and a median American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of 2. Three patients died from pancreatitis despite successful ERCP. Eighty-nine patients were successfully treated with an ERCP alone, and 84 patients (94%) had no recurrence of pancreatitis with a mean follow-up of 41 months (+/-32 months, range 4-118 months). The total patient follow-up was 3,260 months. Twenty-seven patients (33%) died within the follow-up period of unrelated causes, explaining the lower than expected median follow-up. Five patients had a recurrence of pancreatitis during follow-up (6%). Conclusion ERCP with ES is a safe alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy to prevent further attacks of gallstone pancreatitis in high-risk surgical patients and the elderly.
引用
收藏
页码:2205 / 2210
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V324, P1073, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJM199104183241601
[2]
GALLSTONE MIGRATION AS A CAUSE OF ACUTE-PANCREATITIS [J].
ACOSTA, JM ;
LEDESMA, CL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1974, 290 (09) :484-487
[3]
Acosta JM, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V184, P499
[4]
Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: A systematic survey of prospective studies [J].
Andriulli, Angelo ;
Loperfido, Silvano ;
Napolitano, Grazia ;
Niro, Grazia ;
Valvano, Maria Rosa ;
Spirito, Fulvio ;
Pilotto, Alberto ;
Forlano, Rosario .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (08) :1781-1788
[5]
[Anonymous], GUT
[6]
THE BILIARY-TRACT IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS [J].
ARMSTRONG, CP ;
TAYLOR, TV ;
JEACOCK, J ;
LUCAS, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (07) :551-555
[7]
Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial [J].
Boerma, D ;
Rauws, EAJ ;
Keulemans, YCA ;
Janssen, IMC ;
Bolwerk, CJM ;
Timmer, R ;
Boerma, EJ ;
Obertop, H ;
Huibregtse, K ;
Gouma, DJ .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9335) :761-765
[8]
Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly [J].
Brunt, LM ;
Quasebarth, MA ;
Dunnegan, DL ;
Soper, NJ .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (07) :700-705
[9]
Data from Norfolk County Council, 2011, DAT NORF COUNT COUNC
[10]
EARLY TREATMENT OF ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS BY ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOTOMY [J].
FAN, ST ;
LAI, ECS ;
MOK, FPT ;
LO, CM ;
ZHENG, SS ;
WONG, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (04) :228-232