Dose-response and time-course characteristics of UV-A1 erythema

被引:21
作者
Beattie, PE [1 ]
Dawe, RS
Ferguson, J
Ibbotson, SH
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp, Dermatol Dept, Photobiol Unit, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Med Sch, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archderm.141.12.1549
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 [皮肤病与性病学];
摘要
Objective: To determine the time course and dose-response characteristics of UV-A1 erythema in the Tayside region of Scotland. Design: Adult volunteers (skin types I and II [n = 13] and III and IV [n=11]) were exposed to geometric dose series of UV-A1 irradiation from a high-output source on photoprotected lower back and inner forearm skin. Setting: Photobiology unit in a university hospital. Main Outcome Measures: The minimal erythema dose (MED) was recorded visually and erythema was assessed objectively by erythema meter at 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours after exposure. Results: Peak erythema (lowest visual MED) was seen at 8 hours on the back and arm in 11 subjects with skin types I and II and on the back at 8 hours in 9 subjects and on the arm at 4 hours in 10 subjects with skin types III and IV. The lowest median (range) MED was 20 J/cm(2) (14-56 J/cm(2)) on the back and 42 J/cm(2) (20 to > 80j/cm(2)) on the arm at 8 hours for subjects with skin types I and II and 28 J/cm(2) (20-112 J/cm(2)) at 8 hours on the back and 56 J/cm(2) (28-80 J/cm(2)) at 4 hours on the arm for subjects with skin types III and IV. The D-0.025, an objective measure that corresponds approximately to the visual MED, demonstrated a broad peak from 8 to 24 hours. Conclusions: Our local population is more erythemally sensitive to UV-A1 radiation than reports suggest. Daily dose regimens may risk cumulative erythema. Lower starting doses should be used in this population. The wide range of MEDs highlights the need for MED testing.
引用
收藏
页码:1549 / 1555
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Efficacy of ultraviolet A1 phototherapy on the expression of bcl-2 in atopic dermatitis and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in vivo:: a comparison study [J].
Breuckmann, F ;
von Kobyletzki, G ;
Avermaete, A ;
Kreuter, A ;
Altmeyer, P .
PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 2002, 18 (05) :217-222
[2]
A COMPARISON OF THE DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP FOR PSORALEN-UVA ERYTHEMA AND UVB ERYTHEMA [J].
COX, NH ;
FARR, PM ;
DIFFEY, BL .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1989, 125 (12) :1653-1657
[3]
Calculation of erythema dose-response curves using a spreadsheet [J].
Davidson, AW .
PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE, 1999, 15 (3-4) :104-108
[4]
A PORTABLE INSTRUMENT FOR QUANTIFYING ERYTHEMA INDUCED BY ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION [J].
DIFFEY, BL ;
OLIVER, RJ ;
FARR, PM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1984, 111 (06) :663-672
[5]
Dittmar HC, 2001, HAUTARZT, V52, P423, DOI 10.1007/s001050051336
[6]
High-dose ultraviolet A1 (UVA1), but not UVA/UVB therapy, decreases IgE-binding cells in lesional skin of patients with atopic eczema [J].
Grabbe, J ;
Welker, P ;
Humke, S ;
Grewe, M ;
Schopf, E ;
Henz, BM ;
Krutmann, J .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 107 (03) :419-422
[7]
Hannuksela-Svahn A, 1999, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V79, P490
[8]
JEKLER J, 1991, PHOTODERMATOL PHOTO, V8, P151
[9]
TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED SCLERODERMA BY UVA(1) PHOTOTHERAPY [J].
KERSCHER, M ;
DIRSCHKA, T ;
VOLKENANDT, M .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8983) :1166-1166
[10]
KRUTMANN J, 1992, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, P120