An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies

被引:3862
作者
Austin, Peter C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Dept Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; UNTREATED SUBJECTS; BIAS REDUCTION; PERFORMANCE; ADJUSTMENT; SELECTION; BALANCE; SUBCLASSIFICATION; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The propensity score is the probability of treatment assignment conditional on observed baseline characteristics. The propensity score allows one to design and analyze an observational (nonrandomized) study so that it mimics some of the particular characteristics of a randomized controlled trial. In particular, the propensity score is a balancing score: conditional on the propensity score, the distribution of observed baseline covariates will be similar between treated and untreated subjects. I describe 4 different propensity score methods: matching on the propensity score, stratification on the propensity score, inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score, and covariate adjustment using the propensity score. I describe balance diagnostics for examining whether the propensity score model has been adequately specified. Furthermore, I discuss differences between regression-based methods and propensity score-based methods for the analysis of observational data. I describe different causal average treatment effects and their relationship with propensity score analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 424
页数:26
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Springer Series in Statistics
[2]  
[Anonymous], J STAT SOFT IN PRESS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Statistical Science, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013232
[4]  
[Anonymous], J STAT SOFTW
[5]   A comparison of propensity score methods: A case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use [J].
Austin, PC ;
Mamdani, MM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (12) :2084-2106
[6]   The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data [J].
Austin, PC ;
Mamdani, MM ;
Stukel, TA ;
Anderson, GM ;
Tu, JV .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (10) :1563-1578
[7]  
Austin PC, 2008, STAT MED, V27, P2037, DOI 10.1002/sim.3150
[8]   The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 61 (06) :537-545
[9]   Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: A systematic review and suggestions for improvement [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 134 (05) :1128-U7
[10]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (16) :3078-3094