Don't Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption

被引:302
作者
Bastian, Brock [1 ]
Loughnan, Steve [2 ]
Haslam, Nick [3 ]
Radke, Helena R. M.
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
mind attribution; dementalization; morality; meat; animals; ACTION-BASED MODEL; COGNITIVE-DISSONANCE; AROUSAL PROPERTIES; MORAL JUDGMENT/; NEGATIVE AFFECT; ATTRIBUTION; FOOD; DEHUMANIZATION; CONSEQUENCES; AMBIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0146167211424291
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many people like eating meat, but most are reluctant to harm things that have minds. The current three studies show that this dissonance motivates people to deny minds to animals. Study 1 demonstrates that animals considered appropriate for human consumption are ascribed diminished mental capacities. Study 2 shows that meat eaters are motivated to deny minds to food animals when they are reminded of the link between meat and animal suffering. Finally, Study 3 provides direct support for our dissonance hypothesis, showing that expectations regarding the immediate consumption of meat increase mind denial. Moreover, this mind denial in turn reduces negative affect associated with dissonance. The findings highlight the role of dissonance reduction in facilitating the practice of meat eating and protecting cultural commitments.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 256
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Encyclopedia of food
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1957, Selective Exposure Theory
[3]   Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency [J].
Bandura, A ;
Barbaranelli, C ;
Caprara, GV .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :364-374
[4]  
Bandura A, 1999, Pers Soc Psychol Rev, V3, P193, DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
[5]   Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status [J].
Bastian, Brock ;
Laham, Simon M. ;
Wilson, Sam ;
Haslam, Nick ;
Koval, Peter .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 50 (03) :469-483
[6]   THE VEGETARIAN OPTION - VARIETIES, CONVERSIONS, MOTIVES AND CAREERS [J].
BEARDSWORTH, A ;
KEIL, T .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1992, 40 (02) :253-293
[7]  
Beardsworth AlanTeresa Keil., 1997, Sociology on the Menu: An Invitation to the Study of Food and Society, V1st
[8]   Risks of meat: the relative impact of cognitive, affective and moral concerns [J].
Berndsen, M ;
van der Pligt, J .
APPETITE, 2005, 44 (02) :195-205
[9]   Ambivalence towards meat [J].
Berndsen, M ;
van der Pligt, J .
APPETITE, 2004, 42 (01) :71-78
[10]   The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores [J].
Bilewicz, Michal ;
Imhoff, Roland ;
Drogosz, Marek .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 41 (02) :201-209