The reliability and minimal detectable change of Timed Up and Go test in individuals with grade 1-3 knee osteoarthritis

被引:146
作者
Alghadir, Ahmad [1 ]
Anwer, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Brismee, Jean-Michel [3 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Rehabil Res Chair, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Dr DY Patil Coll Physiotherapy, Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Rehabil Res, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
关键词
ASSESS PHYSICAL FUNCTION; 4; PERFORMANCE-MEASURES; HIP; ARTHRITIS; ARTHROPLASTY; PREVALENCE; OUTCOMES; RESPONSIVENESS; IMPROVEMENT; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-015-0637-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is quick and easy tests to assess patients' functional mobility. However, its reliability in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) has not been well established. The aims of this study were to determine the reliability and minimal detectable change of the TUG test in individuals with doubtful to moderate (Grade 1-3) knee OA. Methods: Sixty-five subjects (25 male, 40 female), aged 45-70 years, with knee OA participated. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using two observers at different times of the same day in an alternating order. Intra-rater reliability was assessed on two consecutive visits with a 2-day interval. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated to determine statistically meaningful changes. Results: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.97 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.95 - 0.98) and 0.96 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.94 - 0.97), respectively. The MDC, based on measurements by a single rater and between raters, was 1.10 and 1.14 seconds, respectively. Conclusions: The TUG is a reliable test with adequate MDC for clinical use in individuals with doubtful to moderate knee OA.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Prevalence of radiographic knee osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia [J].
Al-Arfaj, A ;
Al-Boukai, AA .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 21 (02) :142-145
[2]
DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING OF OSTEOARTHRITIS - CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
ALTMAN, R ;
ASCH, E ;
BLOCH, D ;
BOLE, G ;
BORENSTEIN, D ;
BRANDT, K ;
CHRISTY, W ;
COOKE, TD ;
GREENWALD, R ;
HOCHBERG, M ;
HOWELL, D ;
KAPLAN, D ;
KOOPMAN, W ;
LONGLEY, S ;
MANKIN, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MEDSGER, T ;
MEENAN, R ;
MIKKELSEN, W ;
MOSKOWITZ, R ;
MURPHY, W ;
ROTHSCHILD, B ;
SEGAL, M ;
SOKOLOFF, L ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (08) :1039-1049
[3]
*AM ED RES ASS JOI, 2002, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[4]
How do GPs use x rays to manage chronic knee pain in the elderly?: A case study [J].
Bedson, J ;
Jordan, K ;
Croft, P .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 (05) :450-454
[5]
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[6]
OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis [J].
Dobson, F. ;
Hinman, R. S. ;
Roos, E. M. ;
Abbott, J. H. ;
Stratford, P. ;
Davis, A. M. ;
Buchbinder, R. ;
Snyder-Mackler, L. ;
Henrotin, Y. ;
Thumboo, J. ;
Hansen, P. ;
Bennell, K. L. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 (08) :1042-1052
[7]
Measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review [J].
Dobson, F. ;
Hinman, R. S. ;
Hall, M. ;
Terwee, C. B. ;
Roos, E. M. ;
Bennell, K. L. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 (12) :1548-1562
[8]
Dutch Orthopaedic Society, 2007, GUID DIAGN MAN HIP K
[9]
FERRAZ MB, 1990, J RHEUMATOL, V17, P1022
[10]
Responsiveness of physical function outcomes following physiotherapy intervention for osteoarthritis of the knee: an outcome comparison study [J].
French, Helen P. ;
Fitzpatrick, Martina ;
FitzGerald, Oliver .
PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2011, 97 (04) :302-308