The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey -: The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults

被引:560
作者
Côté, P
Cassidy, JD
Carroll, L
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Inst Hlth & Outcomes Res, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Royal Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Hlth Psychol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W8, Canada
关键词
disability; epidemiology; neck; pain; prevalence;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199808010-00015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Population-based, cross-sectional mailed survey. Objective. To determine the lifetime, period, and point prevalence of neck pain and its related disability among Saskatchewan adults and investigate the presence and strength of nonresponse bias. Summary of Background Data. In Europe, the lifetime and point prevalence of neck pain is almost as high as the prevalence of low back pain. Similarly, chronic neck pain is highly prevalent and a common source of disability in the working-age population. However: no studies specifically have documented the prevalence of neck pain and its related disability in North America. Methods, The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey was mailed to 2184 random ly selected Saskatchewan adults aged 20-69 years. Fifty-five percent of the study population participated. The presence of nonresponse bias was investigated through logistic regression and wave analysis. The Chronic Pain Questionnaire was used to classify the severity of chronic neck pain. Results. The age-standardized lifetime prevalence of neck pain is 66.7% (95% confidence interval, 63.8-69.5), and the point prevalence is 22.2% (95% confidence interval 19.7-24.7). The age-standardized 6-month prevalence of low-intensity and low-disability neck pain is 39.7% (95% confidence interval, 36.7-42.7), whereas it is 10.1% (95% confidence interval, 8.2-11.9) for high-intensity and low-disability neck pain and 4.6% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-5.8) for significantly disabling neck pain. The prevalence of low-intensity and low-disability neck pain decreases with age. More women experience high-disability neck pain than men. Wave analysis suggests that the point prevalence and 6-month prevalence of high-intensity and low-disability neck pain are overestimated in this survey. Conclusion. This cross-sectional study shows that neck pain is highly prevalent in Saskatchewan and that it significantly disables 4.6% (95% confidence interval; 3.3-5.8) of the adult population.
引用
收藏
页码:1689 / 1698
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   CHRONIC PAIN IN A GEOGRAPHICALLY DEFINED GENERAL-POPULATION - STUDIES OF DIFFERENCES IN AGE, GENDER, SOCIAL-CLASS, AND PAIN LOCALIZATION [J].
ANDERSSON, HI ;
EJLERTSSON, G ;
LEDEN, I ;
ROSENBERG, C .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1993, 9 (03) :174-182
[2]   MORTALITY AND CANCER RATES IN NONRESPONDENTS TO A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF OLDER WOMEN - 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
BISGARD, KM ;
FOLSOM, AR ;
HONG, CP ;
SELLERS, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (10) :990-1000
[3]   NECK PAIN IN THE GENERAL-POPULATION [J].
BOVIM, G ;
SCHRADER, H ;
SAND, T .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (12) :1307-1309
[4]   THE PREVALENCE OF PAIN IN A GENERAL-POPULATION - THE RESULTS OF A POSTAL SURVEY IN A COUNTY OF SWEDEN [J].
BRATTBERG, G ;
THORSLUND, M ;
WIKMAN, A .
PAIN, 1989, 37 (02) :215-222
[5]   CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS TO A QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ESTIMATING COMMUNITY MOOD [J].
COMSTOCK, GW ;
HELSING, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1973, 97 (04) :233-239
[6]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS IN A POPULATION-BASED CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE STUDY [J].
CRIQUI, MH ;
BARRETTCONNOR, E ;
AUSTIN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1978, 108 (05) :367-372
[7]  
Hasvold Toralf, 1993, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, V11, P219, DOI 10.3109/02813439308994834
[8]   THE COMMONEST RHEUMATIC COMPLAINTS OF OVER 6 WEEKS DURATION IN A 12-MONTH PERIOD IN A DEFINED SWEDISH POPULATION [J].
JACOBSSON, L ;
LINDGARDE, F ;
MANTHORPE, R .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1989, 18 (06) :353-360
[9]  
KLEINBAUM DG, 1982, EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RES, P183
[10]  
MAKELA M, 1991, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V134, P1356