Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future

被引:213
作者
Kurhanewicz, John [1 ]
Vigneron, Daniel [1 ]
Carroll, Peter [2 ]
Coakley, Fergus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
diffusion tensor imaging; dynamic contrast imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f19d01
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Purpose of review The purpose of this article is to review the current status of advanced MRI techniques based on anatomic, metabolic and physiologic properties of prostate cancer with a focus on their impact in managing prostate cancer patients. Recent findings Prostate cancer can be identified based on reduced T-2 signal intensity on MRI, increased choline and decreased citrate and polyamines on magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), decreased diffusivity on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and increased uptake on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging. All can be obtained within a 60-min 3T magnetic resonance exam. Each complementary method has inherent advantages and disadvantages: T-2 MRI has high sensitivity but poor specificity; magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging has high specificity but poor sensitivity; diffusion tensor imaging has high spatial resolution, is the fastest, but sensitivity/specificity needs to be established; dynamic contrast enhanced imaging has high spatial resolution, but requires a gadolinium based contrast agent injection, and sensitivity/specificity needs to be established. Summary The best characterization of prostate cancer in individual patients will most likely result from a multiparametric (MRI/MRSI/DTI/DCE) exam using 3T magnetic resonance scanners but questions remain as to how to analyze and display this large amount of imaging data, and how to optimally combine the data for the most accurate assessment of prostate cancer. Histological correlations or clinical outcomes are required to determine sensitivity/specificity for each method and optimal combinations of these approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]
Transition zone prostate cancers: Features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging [J].
Akin, Oguz ;
Sala, Evis ;
Moskowitz, Chaya S. ;
Kuroiwa, Kentaro ;
Ishill, Nicole M. ;
Pucar, Darko ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (03) :784-792
[2]
[Anonymous], INT BRAZ J UROL
[3]
Barentsz JO, 1999, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V10, P295, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<295::AID-JMRI10>3.0.CO
[4]
2-Z
[5]
PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA - STAGING WITH MR IMAGING AT 1.5-T [J].
BEZZI, M ;
KRESSEL, HY ;
ALLEN, KS ;
SCHIEBLER, ML ;
ALTMAN, HG ;
WEIN, AJ ;
POLLACK, HM .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :339-346
[6]
THE ABNORMAL PROSTATE - MR IMAGING AT 1.5 T WITH HISTOPATHOLOGIC CORRELATION [J].
CARROL, CL ;
SOMMER, FG ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
STAMEY, TA .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 163 (02) :521-525
[7]
Carroll Peter R, 2006, Rev Urol, V8 Suppl 1, pS4
[8]
Focal therapy for prostate cancer 1996: Maximizing outcome [J].
Carroll, PR ;
Presti, JC ;
Small, E ;
Roach, M .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (3A) :84-94
[9]
CASCIANI E, 2006, ABDOM IMAGING
[10]
CHEN A, 2006, P ISMRM 14 ANN M, P587