Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: The voter's illusion and the belief in personal relevance

被引:48
作者
Acevedo, M
Krueger, JI
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Psychol, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Dept Psychol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
voting; projection; counterfactual reasoning; social dilemmas;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00359.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The decision to vote in a national election requires a choice between serving a social good and satisfying one's self-interest. Viewed as a cooperative response in a social dilemma, casting a vote seems irrational because it cannot have a discernible effect on the electoral outcome. The findings of two studies with undergraduate samples suggest that some people vote not because they set aside self-interest, but because they expect their own behaviors to matter. Two psychological processes contribute to this belief: the voter's illusion (the projection of one's own choice between voting and abstention to supporters of the same party or candidate), and the belief in personal relevance (the belief that one's own vote matters regardless of its predictive value for the behavior of others). The rationality of these two egocentric mechanisms depends on the normative framework invoked. Their relevance for actual voting behavior is indicated by their ability to account for four types of variation in turnout rates.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 134
页数:20
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   RATIONAL CHOICE AND TURNOUT [J].
ALDRICH, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 37 (01) :246-278
[2]   Values and voting [J].
Barnea, MF ;
Schwartz, SH .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 19 (01) :17-40
[4]  
Brennan Geoffrey, 1993, Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference
[5]  
BRODSKY DM, 1993, SOCIAL SCI Q, V74, P287
[6]  
CHAITAS S, 1998, STUDENTS ATTITUDES S
[7]   Social categorization moderates social projection [J].
Clement, RW ;
Krueger, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 38 (03) :219-231
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[9]   Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction [J].
Colman, AM .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2003, 26 (02) :139-+
[10]  
Dawes R. M., 1998, The handbook of social psychology, V1, P497