A triangular relationship between leaf size and seed size among woody species: allometry, ontogeny, ecology and taxonomy

被引:122
作者
Cornelissen, JHC
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Ctr Arctic Ecol, Sheffield S10 5BR, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Unit Comparat Plant Ecol, Sheffield S10 5BR, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
allometric; ecological strategy; leaf area; ontogenetic; seed weight;
D O I
10.1007/s004420050725
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A hypothesized relationship between seed weight and leaf size was investigated for 58 diverse British (semi-)woody species. Interspecific variation in leaf size of adult plants corresponded allometrically with interspecific variation in the weight of an infructescence (seed-bearing inflorescence). The relationship between seed size and leaf size of adult plants was triangular. The corners of the triangle were interpreted in terms of ecological strategy. Medium-sized infructescences, small seeds and large leaves were seen among medium-sized, fast-growing, earlier-successional, mostly deciduous shrubs and trees; small infructescences, small seeds and small leaves mostly among low, slow-growing evergreens from stress-prone, proclimax habitats; and large infructescences, large seeds and large leaves among slow-growing, later-successional trees of potential competitive vigour. The hypothesis that the combination of large seeds and small leaves is allometrically unlikely was supported by the data. The roles of ontogeny and taxonomic relatedness in the seed size-leaf size relationship were examined by correlative and taxonomic analyses of seed, plant and leaf size during the unfolding, of the life history from seed through two seedling phases to adulthood. Deciduous versus evergreen leaf habit was a source of deviation from the otherwise linear allometric relationships during ontogenetic development, none of which were, individually, confounded significantly with taxonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 255
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   ALLOMETRY AND SEXUAL DIFFERENCES IN LEAF SIZE [J].
BOND, WJ ;
MIDGLEY, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1988, 131 (06) :901-910
[2]   CLASSIFYING THE LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGIES OF TREES ON THE BASIS OF THE GRIMIAN MODEL [J].
BRZEZIECKI, B ;
KIENAST, F .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 69 (1-3) :167-187
[3]   DIAMETERS AND DRY WEIGHTS OF TREE SHOOTS - EFFECTS OF YOUNGS MODULUS, TAPER, DEFLECTION AND ANGLE [J].
CANNELL, MGR ;
MORGAN, J ;
MURRAY, MB .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 4 (03) :219-231
[4]   GROWTH-PATTERNS AND BENDING MECHANICS OF BRANCHES [J].
CASTERA, P ;
MORLIER, V .
TREES-STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION, 1991, 5 (04) :232-238
[5]   THE ECOLOGY OF LEAF LIFE SPANS [J].
CHABOT, BF ;
HICKS, DJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1982, 13 :229-259
[6]   Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types [J].
Cornelissen, JHC ;
Diez, PC ;
Hunt, R .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1996, 84 (05) :755-765
[7]  
Cornelissen JHC, 1998, INHERENT VARIATION IN PLANT GROWTH, P363
[8]   THE DURIAN THEORY OR THE ORIGIN OF THE MODERN TREE [J].
CORNER, EJH .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1949, 13 (52) :367-414
[9]  
CRONQUIST A, 1981, INTEGRATED SYSTEM CL
[10]  
Givnish T., 1979, Topics in plant population biology., P375