A Bayesian Approach to Real Options: The Case of Distinguishing between Temporary and Permanent Shocks

被引:36
作者
Grenadier, Steven R. [1 ]
Malenko, Andrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
INVESTMENT; EXPERIMENTATION; UNCERTAINTY; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01599.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Traditional real options models demonstrate the importance of the "option to wait" due to uncertainty over future shocks to project cash flows. However, there is often another important source of uncertainty: uncertainty over the permanence of past shocks. Adding Bayesian uncertainty over the permanence of past shocks augments the traditional option to wait with an additional "option to learn." The implied investment behavior differs significantly from that in standard models. For example, investment may occur at a time of stable or decreasing cash flows, respond sluggishly to cash flow shocks, and depend on the timing of project cash flows.
引用
收藏
页码:1949 / 1986
页数:38
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, GLOB EC PROSP DEV CO
[2]  
BACHMANN R, 2008, 12336 NBER U MICH
[3]   Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning [J].
Bergemann, D ;
Hege, U .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1998, 22 (6-8) :703-735
[4]   The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks [J].
Bloom, Nicholas .
ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (03) :623-685
[5]   Strategic experimentation [J].
Bolton, P ;
Harris, C .
ECONOMETRICA, 1999, 67 (02) :349-374
[6]   Irreversible decisions and record-setting news principles [J].
Boyarchenko, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 94 (03) :557-568
[7]   EVALUATING NATURAL-RESOURCE INVESTMENTS [J].
BRENNAN, MJ ;
SCHWARTZ, ES .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1985, 58 (02) :135-157
[8]  
Caballero RJ, 1995, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1
[9]  
CABALLERO RJ, 2003, 9898 NBER MIT
[10]  
Décamps JP, 2005, MATH OPER RES, V30, P472, DOI [10.1287/moor.1040.0132, 10.1087/moor.1040.0132]