Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study Comparing Concurrent Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Radiation Followed by Adjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Cisplatin and Radiation in Patients With Stage IIB to IVA Carcinoma of the Cervix

被引:422
作者
Duenas-Gonzalez, Alfonso
Zarba, Juan J.
Patel, Firuza
Alcedo, Juan C.
Beslija, Semir
Casanova, Luis
Pattaranutaporn, Pittayapoom
Hameed, Shahid
Blair, Julie M.
Barraclough, Helen
Orlando, Mauro [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly Interamer, RA-1430 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; PELVIC RADIATION; UTERINE CERVIX; CANCER; CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PROLONGATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9663
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose To determine whether addition of gemcitabine to concurrent cisplatin chemoradiotherapy and as adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin improves progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years compared with current standard of care in locally advanced cervical cancer. Patients and Methods Eligible chemotherapy-and radiotherapy-naive patients with stage IIB to IVA disease and Karnofsky performance score >= 70 were randomly assigned to arm A (cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 125 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent external-beam radiotherapy [XRT] 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, followed by brachytherapy [BCT] 30 to 35 Gy in 96 hours, and then two adjuvant 21-day cycles of cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2) on day 1, plus gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) or to arm B (cisplatin and concurrent XRT followed by BCT only; dosing same as for arm A). Results Between May 2002 and March 2004, 515 patients were enrolled (arm A, n = 259; arm B, n = 256). PFS at 3 years was significantly improved in arm A versus arm B (74.4% v 65.0%, respectively; P = .029), as were overall PFS (log-rank P = .0227; hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), overall survival (log-rank P = .0224; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.95), and time to progressive disease (log-rank P = .0012; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more frequent in arm A than in arm B (86.5% v 46.3%, respectively; P < .001), including two deaths possibly related to treatment toxicity in arm A. Conclusion Gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemoradiotherapy followed by BCT and adjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy improved survival outcomes with increased but clinically manageable toxicity when compared with standard treatment. J Clin Oncol 29:1678-1685. (C) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1678 / 1685
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis [J].
Alberts, David S. ;
Brady, Mark ;
Cikaric, Slobodan ;
Chen, Hongwei ;
Dinshaw, Ketayun ;
Eifel, Patricia J. ;
Garipagaoglu, Melahat ;
Jakobsen, Anders ;
Kantardzic, Nermina ;
Keys, Henry ;
Lal, Punita ;
Lanciano, Rachelle ;
Leborgne, Felix ;
Lorvidhaya, Vicharn ;
Onishi, Hiroshi ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. ;
Pearcey, Robert G. ;
Pras, Elizabeth ;
Roberts, Kenneth ;
Rose, Peter G. ;
Stewart, Lesley A. ;
Tierney, Jayne F. ;
Thomas, Gillian ;
Trimble, Ted ;
Vale, Claire ;
Whitney, Charles W. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (01)
[2]
*AM JOINT COMM CAN, 1997, AJCC CANC STAG MAN, P190
[3]
Radiosensitizers in cervical cancer.: Cisplatin and beyond [J].
Candelaria, Myrna ;
Garcia-Arias, Alicia ;
Cetina, Lucely ;
Duenas-Gonzalez, Alfonso .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2006, 1 (1)
[4]
The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical cancer by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy [J].
Chen, SW ;
Liang, JA ;
Yang, SN ;
Ko, HL ;
Lin, FJ .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 67 (01) :69-76
[5]
Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer:: A randomized phase II study [J].
Dueñas-González, A ;
Cetina-Perez, L ;
Lopez-Graniel, C ;
Gonzalez-Enciso, A ;
Gómez-Gonzalez, E ;
Rivera-Rubi, L ;
Montalvo-Esquivel, G ;
Muñoz-Gonzalez, D ;
Robles-Flores, J ;
Vazquez-Govea, E ;
De La Garza, J ;
Mohar, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :817-823
[6]
Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01 [J].
Eifel, PJ ;
Winter, K ;
Morris, M ;
Levenback, C ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Cooper, J ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, D ;
Mutch, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) :872-880
[7]
GREEN J, 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V3
[8]
Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Green, JA ;
Kirwan, JM ;
Tierney, JF ;
Symonds, P ;
Fresco, L ;
Collingwood, M ;
Williams, CJ .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9284) :781-786
[9]
Gemcitabine activity in cervical cancer cell lines [J].
Hernández, P ;
Olivera, P ;
Dueñas-Gonzalez, A ;
Pérez-Pastenes, MA ;
Zárate, A ;
Maldonado, V ;
Meléndez-Zajgla, J .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 48 (06) :488-492
[10]
Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma [J].
Keys, HM ;
Bundy, BN ;
Stehman, FB ;
Muderspach, LI ;
Chafe, WE ;
Suggs, CL ;
Walker, JL ;
Gersell, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1154-1161