Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach

被引:885
作者
Lea, MR
Street, BV
机构
[1] Open Univ, Inst Educ Technol, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, England
[2] Kings Coll London, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03075079812331380364
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article addresses the issue of student writing in higher education. It draws on the findings of an Economic and Social Research Council funded project which examined the contrasting expectations and interpretations of academic staff and students regarding undergraduate students' written assignments. It is suggested that the implicit models that have generally been used to understand student writing do not adequately take account of the importance of issues of identity and the institutional relationships of power and authority that surround, and are embedded within, diverse student writing practices across the university. A contrasting and therefore complementary perspective is used to present debates about 'good' and 'poor' student writing. The article outlines an 'academic literacies' framework which can take account of the conflicting and contested nature of writing practices, and may therefore be more valuable for understanding student writing in today's higher education than traditional models and approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 172
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[2]  
[Anonymous], PERSPECTIVES ACAD LI
[3]   Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment [J].
Ashworth, P ;
Bannister, P ;
Thorne, P .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1997, 22 (02) :187-203
[4]  
BAKER D, 1995, CHALLENGING WAYS KNO
[5]  
Barton D., 1994, Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language
[6]  
Baynham M., 1995, LITERACY PRACTICES
[7]  
Bazerman C., 1988, SHAPING WRITTEN KNOW
[8]  
Berkenkotter C., 1995, GENRE KNOWLEDGE DISC
[9]  
Fairclough Norman., 1992, DISCOURSE SOCIAL CHA
[10]  
Gibbs G., 1994, Improving student learning. Through assessment and evaluation