A comparison of international standards for the beneficial use of biomaterials: Can we see where we might be going?

被引:3
作者
Evans, T
机构
[1] Tim Evans Environment, Ashtead
来源
JOURNAL OF THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT | 2001年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
auditing; biomaterials; biosolids; good practice; quality assurance; recycling; sewage sludge;
D O I
10.1111/j.1747-6593.2001.tb00306.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stakeholder confidence, environmental protection, and due diligence are fundamental to the sustainable recycling of biosolids and other organic residuals. Open, independent, expert validation of recycling should be an important support to, and underpin, the entire process. This paper (a) draws from information gathered during European Standards' work, and from other sources, to explore the consistencies and differences which exist between countries, (b) explores why some of these differences have arisen, (c) discusses the recommendations for future improvements, and (d) recommends that the recyclers of residuals should be more proactive in order to maximise their opportunity to influence and direct their destinies.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 71
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*ADAS, 1999, SAF SLUDG MATR GUID
[2]  
*CHART I WAT ENV M, 1999, P INT C CONTR PREV O
[3]  
*COM EUR NORM, 2000, REC PRES EXT SLUDG U
[4]  
*COUNC EUR COMM, 1986, OFFICIAL J, P43
[5]  
*DEP ENV TRANSP RE, 1996, COD PRACT AGR US SEW
[6]  
*EUR COMM, 2000, COMM PREC PRINC BRUS
[7]  
*EUR COMM DG ENV W, 2000, WORK DOC SLUDG
[8]  
*EUR COMM DG ENV W, 1999, X1E3LM4 EUR COM DG E
[9]  
European Commission, 2000, WHIT PAP ENV LIAB
[10]  
LINDERHOLM K, 1999, COMMUNICATION