Strong items get suppressed, weak items do not: The role of item strength in output interference

被引:80
作者
Bauml, KH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Inst Psychol, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03208822
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
An experiment is reported that examines the role of item strength in output interference. Subjects studied two types of categorized item lists: lists in which each category consisted of strong and moderate items, and lists in which each category consisted of weak and moderate items. Different degrees of item strength were accomplished by varying the items' taxonomic frequency within a category. The subjects either recalled a category's strong and weak items before its moderate items, or vice versa. The prior recall of the moderate items impaired the later recall of the strong items, but did not impair the later recall of the weak items. This effect of item strength indicates that output interference is caused by a process of retrieval suppression. It additionally suggests that, in order to minimize output-interference effects in recall, a list's strong items should be recalled before its weak items.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 463
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   ON THE STATUS OF INHIBITORY MECHANISMS IN COGNITION - MEMORY RETRIEVAL AS A MODEL CASE [J].
ANDERSON, MC ;
SPELLMAN, BA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 102 (01) :68-100
[2]   REMEMBERING CAN CAUSE FORGETTING - RETRIEVAL DYNAMICS IN LONG-TERM-MEMORY [J].
ANDERSON, MC ;
BJORK, RA ;
BJORK, EL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1994, 20 (05) :1063-1087
[3]   CATEGORY NORMS FOR VERBAL ITEMS IN 56 CATEGORIES - A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION OF CONNECTICUT CATEGORY NORMS [J].
BATTIG, WF ;
MONTAGUE, WE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (3P2) :1-&
[4]   The list-strength effect: Strength-dependent competition or suppression? [J].
Bauml, KH .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (02) :260-264
[5]   Revisiting an old issue: Retroactive interference as a function of the degree of original and interpolated learning [J].
Bauml, KH .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1996, 3 (03) :380-384
[6]   IS RETRIEVABILITY GROUPING GOOD FOR RECALL [J].
BRAINERD, CJ ;
REYNA, VF ;
HARNISHFEGER, KK ;
HOWE, ML .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1993, 122 (02) :249-268
[7]   THE LAST SHALL BE 1ST - HOW MEMORY STRENGTH AFFECTS CHILDRENS RETRIEVAL [J].
BRAINERD, CJ ;
REYNA, VF ;
HOWE, ML ;
KEVERSHAN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1990, 1 (04) :247-252
[8]  
DaPolito F. J., 1966, THESIS INDIANA U
[9]  
MANNHAUPT HR, 1983, SPRACHE KOGNIT, V4, P264
[10]   TEMPORAL CHANGES IN INTERFERENCE [J].
POSTMAN, L ;
STARK, K ;
FRASER, J .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1968, 7 (03) :672-&