Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty:: A multicenter study of 55 procedures

被引:121
作者
Soulié, M
Salomon, L
Patard, JJ
Mouly, P
Manunta, A
Antiphon, P
Lobel, B
Abbou, CC
Plante, P
机构
[1] Rangueil Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Toulouse, France
[2] Univ Creteil, Hop Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, Creteil, France
[3] Univ Rennes, Hop Pontchaillou, Dept Urol, Rennes, France
关键词
kidney; laparoscopy; ureteral obstruction;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66073-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assessed the feasibility, reproducibility and morbidity of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Materials and Methods: A total of 55 retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed at 3 institutions between September 1996 and May 2000 in 33 women and 21 men. Results were analyzed in regard to radiological assessment by excretory urography at 3 months, complications and hospital stay. Results: We performed dismembered pyeloplasty in 48 cases and Fenger plasty in 7 cases. Crossing vessels were noted in 23 patients. The conversion rate was 5.4%. Mean operative time was 185 minutes (range 100 to 260), mean hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 1 to 14) and mean followup was 14.4 months (range 6 to 43.6). The overall complication rate was 12.7%. Complications in 7 patients included hematoma in 3, urinoma in 1, severe pyelonephritis in I and anastomotic stricture in 2 requiring open pyeloplasty at 3 weeks and delayed balloon incision at 13 months, respectively. Excretory urography in 50 patients and ultrasound in 4 showed. decreased hydronephrosis in 88.9% at 3 months. Normal physical activity and absent pain were reported by 47 patients (87%) 1 month after surgery. Conclusions: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty seems to be a valuable alternative to open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The long-term outcome must be assessed before this procedure may be definitively validated.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 50
页数:3
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Assessment of objective and subjective outcome [J].
Bauer, JJ ;
Bishoff, JT ;
Moore, RG ;
Chen, RN ;
Iverson, AJ ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (03) :692-695
[2]   Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Initial experience in 15 cases [J].
Ben Slama, MR ;
Salomon, L ;
Hoznek, A ;
Cicco, A ;
Saint, F ;
Alame, W ;
Antiphon, P ;
Chopin, DK ;
Abbou, CC .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (01) :45-48
[3]   Laparoscopic bowel injury: Incidence and clinical presentation [J].
Bishoff, JT ;
Allaf, ME ;
Kirkels, W ;
Moore, RG ;
Kavoussi, LR ;
Schroder, F .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (03) :887-890
[4]   COMPARISON OF OPEN AND ENDOUROLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE OBSTRUCTED URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION [J].
BROOKS, JD ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
PREMINGER, GM ;
SCHUESSLER, WW ;
MOORE, RG .
UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (06) :791-795
[5]   Laparoscopic pyeloplasty - Indications, technique, and long-term outcome [J].
Chen, RN ;
Moore, RG ;
Kavoussi, LR .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 25 (02) :323-+
[6]   ADVANCES IN UROLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY [J].
GILL, IS ;
CLAYMAN, RV ;
MCDOUGALL, EM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (04) :1275-1294
[7]   Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: An international perspective [J].
Gill, IS ;
Clayman, RV ;
Albala, DM ;
Aso, Y ;
Chiu, AW ;
Das, S ;
Donovan, JF ;
Fuchs, GJ ;
Gaur, DD ;
Go, H ;
Gomella, LG ;
Grune, MT ;
Harewood, LM ;
Janetschek, G ;
Knapp, PM ;
McDougall, EM ;
Nakada, SY ;
Preminger, GM ;
Puppo, P ;
Rassweiler, JJ ;
Royce, PL ;
Thomas, R ;
Urban, DA ;
Winfield, HN .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (04) :566-571
[8]   Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction [J].
Janetschek, G ;
Peschel, R ;
Altarac, S ;
Bartsch, G .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (03) :311-316
[9]  
Jarrett Thomas W., 1999, Journal of Urology, V161, P24
[10]   LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY [J].
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
PETERS, CA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (06) :1891-1894