Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data

被引:68
作者
Agresti, A [1 ]
Min, YY [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Stat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
binomial distribution; difference of proportions; logit model; McNemar's test; odds ratio; relative risk;
D O I
10.1002/sim.1589
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Binary matched-pairs data occur commonly in longitudinal studies, such as in cross-over experiments. Many analyses for comparing the matched probabilities of a particular outcome do not utilize pairs having the same outcome for each observation. An example is McNemar's test. Some methodologists find this to be counterintuitive. We review this issue in the context of subject-specific and population-averaged models for binary data, with various link functions. For standard models and inferential methods, pairs with identical outcomes may affect the estimated size of the effect and its standard error, but they have negligible, if any, effect on significance. We also discuss extension of this result to matched sets. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 75
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ALTHAM PME, 1971, BIOMETRIKA, V58, P561, DOI 10.1093/biomet/58.3.561
[2]  
ANDERSEN EB, 1980, DISCRETE STATE MODEL, P244
[3]  
BISHOP YMM, 1975, DISCRETE MULTIVARIAT, P307
[4]   On the conditional and mixture model approaches for matched pairs [J].
Chen, JH .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1996, 55 (03) :319-329
[5]   THE COMPARISON OF PERCENTAGES IN MATCHED SAMPLES [J].
COCHRAN, WG .
BIOMETRIKA, 1950, 37 (3-4) :256-266
[6]  
COX DR, 1958, BIOMETRIKA, V45, P562, DOI 10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.562
[7]  
Ghosh M, 2000, STAT SINICA, V10, P647
[8]   ESTIMATION OF A COMMON EFFECT PARAMETER FROM SPARSE FOLLOW-UP DATA [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
ROBINS, JM .
BIOMETRICS, 1985, 41 (01) :55-68
[9]   MODELING BINARY DATA FROM A 3-PERIOD CROSSOVER TRIAL [J].
JONES, B ;
KENWARD, MG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (05) :555-564
[10]   AVERAGE PARTIAL ASSOCIATION IN 3-WAY CONTINGENCY-TABLES - REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATIVE TESTS [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
HEYMAN, ER ;
KOCH, GG .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1978, 46 (03) :237-254