Seasonal tertiary wastewater treatment in California: An analysis of public health benefits and costs

被引:6
作者
Olivieri, AW
Soller, JA
Olivieri, KJ
Goebel, RP
Tchobanoglous, G
机构
[1] Amer Assoc Advancement Sci, Natl Ctr Environm Assessment, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[2] EOA Inc, Oakland, CA USA
[3] Smith Coll, Northampton, MA 01063 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
wastewater treatment; seasonal effluent limitations; benefit-cost analysis; microbial risk assessment; water quality evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A number of communities in the Central Valley of California have requested that seasonally based effluent limits be developed for their wastewater treatment facilities. These seasonal limits would be based on disinfected secondary treatment during the winter and disinfected tertiary treatment during the rest of the year. Such a request for seasonal limits raises a significant water quality policy question with regard to the costs and relative benefits of tertiary treatment during the winter season. A benefit-cost analysis for winter season tertiary wastewater treatment in California's Central Valley is presented here. The assumed societal benefit of winter tertiary treatment is enhanced water quality for recreational purposes, and thus reduced risk to public health. Based on the results of this analysis, between four and sixteen million recreation events would need to occur annually region-wide during the winter to justify the costs of winter tertiary treatment. A similar method and the information described herein could be used by the state water quality regulatory agency to develop a risk-based policy to consider seasonal limits. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3035 / 3043
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, EPA440584002
[2]   Status of benefits transfer in the United States and Canada: A review [J].
Bergstrom, JC ;
De Civita, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 1999, 47 (01) :79-87
[3]   BENEFIT TRANSFERS - CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES [J].
BROOKSHIRE, DS ;
NEILL, HR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (03) :651-655
[4]  
COOPER RC, 1991, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V4, P55
[5]  
Desvousges W.H., 1998, Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method
[6]  
*EOA INC, 2001, EV PUBL HLTH RISKS I
[7]   EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MICROBIOLOGICAL POLLUTION CRITERIA FOR RIVER RECREATIONAL WATERS [J].
FERLEY, JP ;
ZMIROU, D ;
BALDUCCI, F ;
BALEUX, B ;
FERA, P ;
LARBAIGT, G ;
JACQ, E ;
MOISSONNIER, B ;
BLINEAU, A ;
BOUDOT, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 18 (01) :198-205
[8]   Marine waters contaminated with domestic sewage: Nonenteric illnesses associated with bather exposure in the United Kingdom [J].
Fleisher, JM ;
Kay, D ;
Salmon, RL ;
Jones, F ;
Wyer, MD ;
Godfree, AF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (09) :1228-1234
[9]  
Hammond P. B., 1990, VALUING HLTH RISKS C
[10]  
*HDR ENG EOA INC, 2001, INV EFFL COL BACT LE