Validation of the Ottawa Knee Rules

被引:36
作者
Emparanza, JI
Aginaga, JR
机构
[1] Hosp Aranzazu, Clin Epidemiol Unit, San Sebastian 20014, Basque Country, Spain
[2] Hosp Gipuzkoa, Dept Emergency, San Sebastian, Basque Country, Spain
[3] CHDO, San Sebastian, Basque Country, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mem.2001.118011
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We sought to validate the Ottawa Knee Rules for determining the need for radiography in patients with acute knee injury. Methods: A prospective cohort study was, performed in emergency departments of 11 hospitals of the Osakidetza-Basque Country Health Service. The patient population was composed of a convenience sample of 1,522 eligible adults of 2,315 patients with acute knee injuries. The attending emergency physicians assessed each patient for Standardized clinical variables and determined the need for radiography according to the decision rule. Radiography was performed in each, patient, irrespective of the determination of the rule, after clinical evaluation findings were recorded. The rule was assessed, for the ability to correctly identify fracture of the knee. Results: The decision rule had a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 1.0), identifying 89 patients with clinically important fractures. The potential reduction in use of radiography was estimated to be 49%, The probability of fracture the decision rules were negative, is estimated W be 0% , (95% Cl 0% to 0.5%). Conclusion: Prospective validation has shown the Ottawa Knee Rules to, be 100% sensitive for identifying fractures of the knee and to have the potential to allow physicians to reduce the use of radiography in patients with acute knee injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 368
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bauer Steven J., 1995, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V13, P611, DOI 10.1016/0736-4679(95)00064-H
[2]  
Cameron C, 1999, CAN MED ASSOC J, V160, P1165
[3]  
DIERCKS DB, 1997, ACAD EMERG MED, V4, P408
[4]  
FEINSTEIN A.R., 1987, CLINIMETRICS
[5]   Clinical prediction rules - A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards [J].
Laupacis, A ;
Sekar, N ;
Stiell, IG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (06) :488-494
[6]   An economic analysis of the Ottawa Knee Rule [J].
Nichol, G ;
Stiell, IG ;
Wells, GA ;
Juergensen, LS ;
Laupacis, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 34 (04) :438-447
[7]   Multicenter comparison of two clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute, high-risk knee injuries [J].
Seaberg, DC ;
Yealy, DM ;
Lukens, T ;
Auble, T ;
Mathias, S .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 32 (01) :8-13
[8]   CLINICAL DECISION RULE FOR KNEE RADIOGRAPHS [J].
SEABERG, DC ;
JACKSON, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 12 (05) :541-543
[9]   Methodologic standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine [J].
Stiell, IG ;
Wells, GA .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 33 (04) :437-447
[10]   USE OF RADIOGRAPHY IN ACUTE KNEE INJURIES - NEED FOR CLINICAL DECISION RULES [J].
STIELL, IG ;
WELLS, GA ;
MCDOWELL, I ;
GREENBERG, GH ;
MCKNIGHT, RD ;
CWINN, AA ;
QUINN, JV ;
YEATS, A .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 2 (11) :966-973