Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India

被引:179
作者
Kathage, Jonas [1 ]
Qaim, Matin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Dev, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
farm survey; small farms; agricultural biotechnology; GENETICALLY-MODIFIED COTTON; MODIFIED CROPS; PANEL-DATA; CHINA; ADOPTION; PRODUCTIVITY; SUPPRESSION; TECHNOLOGY; BENEFITS; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1203647109
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Despite widespread adoption of genetically modified crops in many countries, heated controversies about their advantages and disadvantages continue. Especially for developing countries, there are concerns that genetically modified crops fail to benefit smallholder farmers and contribute to social and economic hardship. Many economic studies contradict this view, but most of them look at short-term impacts only, so that uncertainty about longer-term effects prevails. We address this shortcoming by analyzing economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt cotton in India. Building on unique panel data collected between 2002 and 2008, and controlling for nonrandom selection bias in technology adoption, we show that Bt has caused a 24% increase in cotton yield per acre through reduced pest damage and a 50% gain in cotton profit among smallholders. These benefits are stable; there are even indications that they have increased over time. We further show that Bt cotton adoption has raised consumption expenditures, a common measure of household living standard, by 18% during the 2006-2008 period. We conclude that Bt cotton has created large and sustainable benefits, which contribute to positive economic and social development in India.
引用
收藏
页码:11652 / 11656
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The Adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton and Poverty Reduction in Pakistan [J].
Ali, Akhter ;
Abdulai, Awudu .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 61 (01) :175-192
[2]  
[Anonymous], 01170 IFPRI
[3]   Unbalanced panel data: A survey [J].
Baltagi, Badi H. ;
Song, Seuck Heun .
STATISTICAL PAPERS, 2006, 47 (04) :493-523
[4]   Better technology, better plots, or better farmers? Identifying changes in productivity and risk among Malagasy rice farmers [J].
Barrett, CB ;
Moser, CM ;
McHugh, OV ;
Barison, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 86 (04) :869-888
[5]   Farm-level economic performance of genetically modified cotton in Maharashtra, India [J].
Bennett, R ;
Kambhampati, U ;
Morse, S ;
Ismael, Y .
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (01) :59-71
[6]  
Bennett R. M., 2004, AgBioForum, V7, P96
[7]   Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops [J].
Carpenter, Janet E. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 28 (04) :319-321
[8]   Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: Evidence from Indian data [J].
Crost, Benjamin ;
Shankar, Bhavani ;
Bennett, Richard ;
Morse, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 58 (01) :24-36
[9]  
Deaton A., 2019, The analysis of household surveys (Reissue Edition with a New Preface): A Micro econometric Approach to Development Policy
[10]  
Friends of the Earth, 2011, WHO BEN GM CROPS IND