Maxillary perfusion during Le Fort I osteotomy after ligation of the descending palatine artery

被引:57
作者
Dodson, TB
Bays, RA
Neuenschwander, MC
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,SCH MED,DIV ORAL MAXILLOFACIAL SURG,DEPT SURG,ATLANTA,GA 30322
[2] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV HOSP,DEPT OTORHINOLARYNGOL HEAD & NECK SURG,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19107
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90446-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Controversy exists regarding management of the descending palatine artery (DPA) during Le Fort I osteotomy. Some surgeons advocate preserving the DPA, and others ligate the vessels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate maxillary gingival blood flow (GBF) during Le Fort I osteotomy in a sample of patients with and without ligation of the DPA. Patients and Methods: Using a prospective randomized clinical study, we enrolled a study sample composed of 34 patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy. The patients were randomly assigned to either study group 1 (IG)(DPA ligated) or group 2 (18) (DPA preserved). To measure maxillary GBF during the operation, we used laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). The predictor variable was status of DPA management (ligated or preserved). The outcome variable was change in GBF over time. Results: (DPA). Before ligation (or simulated ligation) of the DPA, the mean GBF for groups 1 and 2 was 11.4 +/- 8.6 and 11.9 +/- 9.4 mL/min/100 g tissue, respectively (P = .88). After ligation of the DPA in group 1, the mean GBF was 10.0 +/- 7.7 mL/min/100 g tissue. At the corresponding time in group 2 (DPA preserved), the mean GBF was 12.6 +/- 9.4 mL/min/100 g tissue. The difference in mean GBF between groups 1 and 2 was not statistically significant (P = .43). Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in mean maxillary GBF between patients having the DPA ligated and those having the DPA preserved as measured using LDF during Le Fort I osteotomy.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 55
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF CIGARETTE-SMOKING ON GINGIVAL BLOOD-FLOW IN HUMANS [J].
BAAB, DA ;
OBERG, PA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1987, 14 (07) :418-424
[2]   LASER DOPPLER MEASUREMENT OF GINGIVAL BLOOD-FLOW IN DOGS WITH INCREASING AND DECREASING INFLAMMATION [J].
BAAB, DA ;
OBERG, PA .
ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1987, 32 (08) :551-555
[3]  
Bays RA., 1993, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V51, P142
[4]  
BAYS RA, 1992, PRINCIPLES ORAL MAXI, P1349
[5]  
BELL WH, 1980, J DENT RES, V59, P459
[6]  
BELL WH, 1969, J ORAL SURG, V27, P249
[7]  
BELL WH, 1971, J ORAL SURG, V29, P313
[8]  
BELL WH, 1975, J ORAL SURG, V33, P253
[9]   EVALUATION OF GINGIVAL MICROCIRCULATION BY A LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETER [J].
BOUTAULT, F ;
CADENAT, H ;
HIBERT, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1989, 17 (03) :105-109
[10]  
DODSON T B, 1992, Journal of Dental Research, V71, P603