UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation

被引:1156
作者
Snijders, RJM [1 ]
Noble, P [1 ]
Sebire, N [1 ]
Souka, A [1 ]
Nicolaides, KH [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11280-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 currently relies on assessment of risk followed by invasive testing in the 5% of pregnancies at the highest estimated risk. Selection of the high-risk group by a combination of maternal age and second-trimester maternal serum biochemistry gives a detection rate of about 60%. We investigated assessment of risk by a combination of maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, measured by ultrasonography at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Methods The risk of trisomy 21 was estimated for 96 127 women of median age 31 years (range 14-49) with singleton pregnancies. Ultrasonography was done by 306 appropriately trained sonographers in 22 centres, Risk of trisomy 21 was calculated from the maternal age and gestational-age-related prevalence, multiplied by a likelihood ratio depending on the deviation from normal in nuchal-translucency thickness for crown-rump length. The distribution of risks was investigated and the sensitivity of a cut-off risk of 1 in 300 was calculated. Phenotype was assessed by fetal karyotyping or clinical examination of liveborn infants. Findings The estimated trisomy-21 risk, from maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness, was 1 in 300 or higher in 7907 (8.3%) of 95 476 normal pregnancies, 268 (82.2%) of 326 with trisomy 21, and 253 (77.9%) of 325 with other chromosomal defects. The 5% of the study population with the highest estimated risk included 77% of trisomy-21 cases, Interpretation Selection of the high-risk group for invasive testing by this method allows the detection of about 80% of affected pregnancies, However, even this method of risk assessment requires about 30 invasive tests for identification of one affected fetus.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 346
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] *32 STUD GROUP ROY, 1997, SCREEN DOWN SYNDR FI, P353
  • [2] Assessment of fetal anatomy at 12 to 13 weeks of gestation by transabdominal and transvaginal sonography
    Braithwaite, JM
    Armstrong, MA
    Economides, DL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (01): : 82 - 85
  • [3] THE IMPRECISION IN RATES OF DOWN-SYNDROME BY 1-YEAR MATERNAL AGE INTERVALS - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF RATES USED IN BIOCHEMICAL SCREENING
    HECHT, CA
    HOOK, EB
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 14 (08) : 729 - 738
  • [4] Hyett J, 1997, AM J MED GENET, V69, P207, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970317)69:2<207::AID-AJMG18>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-P
  • [6] Increased nuchal translucency at 10-14 weeks of gestation as a marker for major cardiac defects
    Hyett, JA
    Perdu, M
    Sharland, GK
    Snijders, RSM
    Nicolaides, KH
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 10 (04) : 242 - 246
  • [7] FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY - ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR FETAL TRISOMY IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY
    NICOLAIDES, KH
    BRIZOT, ML
    SNIJDERS, RJM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (09): : 782 - 786
  • [8] FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY - ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR CHROMOSOMAL DEFECTS IN 1ST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY
    NICOLAIDES, KH
    AZAR, G
    BYRNE, D
    MANSUR, C
    MARKS, K
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6831) : 867 - 869
  • [9] Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation
    Pandya, PP
    Snijders, RJM
    Johnson, SP
    Brizot, MD
    Nicolaides, KH
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12): : 957 - 962
  • [10] CHROMOSOMAL DEFECTS AND OUTCOME IN 1015 FETUSES WITH INCREASED NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY
    PANDYA, PP
    KONDYLIOS, A
    HILBERT, L
    SNIJDERS, RJM
    NICOLAIDES, KH
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) : 15 - 19