How Does Centrality in Coopetition Networks Matter? An Empirical Investigation in the Mobile Telephone Industry

被引:64
作者
Sanou, Famara Hyacinthe [1 ]
Le Roy, Frederic [2 ,3 ]
Gnyawali, Devi R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier I, ISEM, Espace Richter Bat B,Rue Vendemiaire, F-34960 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier I, Management Sci, Espace Richter Bat B,Rue Vendemiaire, F-34960 Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier I, Grp Sup Co Montpellier, ISEM, Espace Richter Bat B,Rue Vendemiaire, F-34960 Montpellier, France
[4] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Virginia Tech, Dept Management, 2011 Pamplin Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
CO-OPETITION; COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS; COOPERATION; INNOVATION; COLLABORATION; EMBEDDEDNESS; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/1467-8551.12132
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research examines how a firm's position in a coopetitive network (formed through cooperation among firms within an industry) influences the extent of the firm's competitive aggressiveness and market performance. The authors collected data on the competitive and cooperative actions of firms in the mobile telephone industry from 2000 to 2006, using structured content analysis of news reports. The results show that the centrality of a firm in a coopetitive network contributes to the firm's competitive aggressiveness through increased volume and variety of competitive actions. Further, the more central a firm is in the network, the greater is its market performance. Firms that undertake more volume and variety of competitive actions improve their market performance. Overall, these results show that being in a central position in a coopetition network is quite advantageous for the firm.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 160
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]  
Ferrier W.J., 2002, Managerial and Decision Economics, V23, P301
[22]   The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers [J].
Ferrier, WJ ;
Smith, KG ;
Grimm, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (04) :372-388
[23]   Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness [J].
Ferrier, WJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (04) :858-877
[24]  
Fjeldstad OD., 2004, SCAND J MANAG, V20, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.scaman.2004.05.007
[25]  
Galaskiewicz, 1979, EXCHANGE NETWORKS CO
[26]  
Galaskiewicz J., 1994, ADM SCI Q, V34, P454
[27]  
Gnyawali D.R., 2008, Co-opetition: Promises and challenges, V21st, P386, DOI [10.4135/9781412954006, DOI 10.4135/9781412954006]
[28]   Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: An empirical examination [J].
Gnyawali, Devi R. ;
He, Jinyu ;
Madhavan, Ravindranath .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2006, 32 (04) :507-530
[29]   Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation [J].
Gnyawali, Devi R. ;
Park, Byung-Jin .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (05) :650-663
[30]   Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective [J].
Gnyawali, DR ;
Madhavan, R .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (03) :431-445