Policy planning under uncertainty: Efficient starting populations for simulation-optimization methods applied to municipal solid waste management

被引:34
作者
Huang, GH
Linton, JD
Yeomans, JS [1 ]
Yoogalingam, R
机构
[1] York Univ, Schulich Sch Business, Management Sci Area, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[2] Univ Regina, Fac Engn, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
[3] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Lally Sch Management, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[4] Brock Univ, Dept Management, Fac Business, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
public sector; decision making; uncertainty; simulation; evolutionary algorithms; waste management; planning; modelling to generate alternatives;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.02.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Evolutionary simulation-optimization (ESO) techniques can be adapted to model a wide variety of problem types in which system components are stochastic. Grey programming (GP) methods have been previously applied to numerous environmental planning problems containing uncertain information. In this paper, ESO is combined with GP for policy planning to create a hybrid solution approach named GESO. It can be shown that multiple policy alternatives meeting required system criteria, or modelling-to-generate-alternatives (MGA), can be quickly and efficiently created by applying GESO to this case data. The efficacy of GESO is illustrated using a municipal solid waste management case taken from the regional municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth in the Province of Ontario, Canada. The MGA capability of GESO is especially meaningful for large-scale real-world planning problems and the practicality of this procedure can easily be extended from MSW systems to many other planning applications containing significant sources of uncertainty. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 34
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Simulation optimization:: Integrating research and practice [J].
Andradóttir, S .
INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2002, 14 (03) :216-219
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHM SE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, DECISION ANAL MANAGE
[4]   GENERATING ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING-BASED PLANNING PROBLEMS [J].
BAETZ, BW ;
PAS, EI ;
NEEBE, AW .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 1990, 24 (01) :27-34
[5]   OPTIMIZATION SIMULATION MODELING FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY PLANNING [J].
BAETZ, BW .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE, 1990, 116 (02) :59-79
[6]   Incorporating climate change into risk assessment using grey mathematical programming [J].
Bass, B ;
Huang, GH ;
Russo, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 49 (01) :107-123
[7]  
BODNER RM, 1970, ASCE J SANITARY ENG, V96, P893
[8]  
Brill E. D., 1981, MANAGE SCI, V27, P314
[9]   USE OF OPTIMIZATION MODELS IN PUBLIC-SECTOR PLANNING [J].
BRILL, ED .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 25 (05) :413-422
[10]  
Caudill M., 1990, NATURALLY INTELLIGEN