Potentials of quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing ecosystem services

被引:128
作者
Busch, Malte [1 ]
La Notte, Alessandra [2 ]
Laporte, Valerie [3 ]
Erhard, Markus [3 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Inst Coastal Res, D-21502 Geesthacht, Germany
[2] European Commiss Joint Res Ctr, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[3] European Environm Agcy, DK-1050 Copenhagen K, Denmark
关键词
Ecosystem services; Qualitative assessment; Quantitative valuation; Offshore wind farming; Forest and coastal ecosystem services; Methodology integration; VULNERABILITY; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.010
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Quantitative and qualitative approaches to assessing and valuing ecosystem services have been compared using case studies from Italy and Germany. This paper describes and analyzes two different methods of applying an ecosystem service approach and discusses their relative strengths, shortcomings and peculiarities. This allows the conditions to be identified that best support the application of one or other of these methods. Suggestions are offered on how to integrate both methodologies in order to improve the implementation of an ecosystem service approach in decision-making processes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 103
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ALBERINI A, 2004, INFORM WILLINGNESS P
[2]  
Alberini A., 2004, VALORE NON USO NELL
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB BIOD VAL GUID PO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 42010 EEA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ATLANTE LAGUNA VENEZ
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PROPOSAL COMMON INT
[10]  
Ash N., 2010, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL