Surface runoff water quality in a. managed three zone riparian buffer

被引:63
作者
Lowrance, R [1 ]
Sheridan, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, SE Watershed Res Lab, Tifton, GA 31794 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2004.0291
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Managed riparian forest buffers are an important conservation practice but there are little data on the water quality effects of buffer management. We measured surface runoff volumes and nutrient concentrations and loads in a riparian buffer system consisting of (moving down slope from the field) a grass strip, a managed forest, and an unmanaged forest. The managed forest consisted of sections of clear-cut, thinned, and mature forest. The mature forest had significantly lower flow-weighted concentrations of nitrate, ammonium, total Kjeldahl N (TKN), sediment TKN, total N (nitrate + TKN), dissolved molybdate reactive P (DMRP), total P, and chloride. The average buffer represented the conditions along a stream reach with a buffer system in different stages of growth. Compared with the field output, flow-weighted concentrations of nitrate, ammonium, DMRP, and total P decreased significantly within the buffer and flow-weighted concentrations of TKN, total N, and chloride increased significantly within the buffer. All loads decreased significantly from the field to the middle of the buffer, but most loads increased from the middle of the buffer to the sampling point nearest the stream because surface runoff volume increased near the stream. The largest percentage reduction of the incoming nutrient load (at least 65% for all nutrient forms) took place in the grass buffer zone because of the large decrease (68%) in flow. The average buffer reduced loadings for all nutrient species, from 27% for TKN to 63% for sediment P. The managed forest and grass buffer combined was an effective buffer system.
引用
收藏
页码:1851 / 1859
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Statistical Tables
[2]  
Bosch DD, 1996, T ASAE, V39, P865, DOI 10.13031/2013.27571
[3]  
BOSCH DD, 1994, T ASAE, V37, P1783, DOI 10.13031/2013.28267
[4]   Ecosystem restoration - Water quality changes from riparian buffer restoration in Connecticut [J].
Clausen, JC ;
Guillard, K ;
Sigmund, CM ;
Dors, KM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (06) :1751-1761
[5]   Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters [J].
Daniels, RB ;
Gilliam, JW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1996, 60 (01) :246-251
[6]  
DILLAHA TA, 1989, T ASAE, V32, P513, DOI 10.13031/2013.31033
[7]   Riparian soil response to surface nitrogen input: the indicator potential of free-living soil nematode populations [J].
Ettema, CH ;
Lowrance, R ;
Coleman, DC .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 31 (12) :1625-1638
[8]   Riparian soil response to surface nitrogen input: temporal changes in denitrification, labile and microbial C and N pools, and bacterial and fungal respiration [J].
Ettema, CH ;
Lowrance, R ;
Coleman, DC .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 31 (12) :1609-1624
[9]  
[Greenberg A.E. Standard Methods Standard Methods], 1998, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V20th
[10]  
Hubbard RK, 1998, T ASAE, V41, P1295, DOI 10.13031/2013.17302