Distortion-product source unmixing: A test of the two-mechanism model for DPOAE generation

被引:165
作者
Kalluri, R
Shera, CA
机构
[1] Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Eaton Peabody Lab Auditory Physiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, MIT, Div Hlth Sci & Technol, Speech & Hearing Sci Program, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otol & Laryngol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1334597
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
This paper tests key predictions of the "two-mechanism model" for the generation of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The two-mechanism model asserts that lower-sideband DPOAEs constitute a mixture of emissions arising not simply from two distinct cochlear locations las is now well established) but, more importantly, by two fundamentally different mechanisms: nonlinear distortion induced by the traveling wave and linear coherent reflection off pre-existing micromechanical impedance perturbations. The model predicts that (1) DPOAEs evoked by frequency-scaled stimuli (e.g., at fixed f(2)/f(1)) can be unmixed into putative distortion- and reflection-source components with the frequency dependence of their phases consistent with the presumed mechanisms of generation; (2) The putative reflection-source component of the total DPOAE closely matches the reflection-source emission (e.g., low level stimulus-frequency emission) measured at the same frequency under similar conditions. These predictions were tested by unmixing DPOAEs into components using two completely different methods: (a) selective suppression of the putative reflection source using a third tone near the distortion-product frequency and (b) spectral smoothing (or, equivalently, time-domain windowing). Although the two methods unmix in very different ways, they yield similar DPOAE components. The properties of the two DPOAE components are consistent with the predictions of the two-mechanism model. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 637
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   MICROMECHANICAL MODELS OF THE COCHLEA [J].
ALLEN, JB ;
NEELY, ST .
PHYSICS TODAY, 1992, 45 (07) :40-47
[2]   OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS [J].
ALLEN, JB ;
LONSBURYMARTIN, BL .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 93 (01) :568-569
[3]  
Bogert B.P., 1963, TIME SERIES ANAL, P209
[4]   SUPPRESSION OF STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS [J].
BRASS, D ;
KEMP, DT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 93 (02) :920-939
[5]   TIME-DOMAIN OBSERVATION OF OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS DURING CONSTANT TONE STIMULATION [J].
BRASS, D ;
KEMP, DT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1991, 90 (05) :2415-2427
[6]   Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea [J].
Brown, AM ;
Harris, FP ;
Beveridge, HA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (05) :3260-3267
[7]  
Brownie C., 1997, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, V2, P1, DOI 10.2307/1400638
[8]  
DREISBACH LE, 1999, ASS RES OT ABS, V22, P392
[9]   The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans [J].
Engdahl, B ;
Kemp, DT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 99 (03) :1573-1587
[10]   Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas [J].
Fahey, PF ;
Stagner, BB ;
Lonsbury-Martin, BL ;
Martin, GK .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 108 (04) :1786-1802