Comparing upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric temperatures: Microwave sounding unit, radiosonde, COSPAR International Reference Atmosphere, and National Center for Environmental Prediction National Center for Atmospheric Research reanalysis monthly mean climatologies

被引:7
作者
Shah, KP [1 ]
Rind, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, Ctr Climate Syst Res, New York, NY 10024 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/98JD02452
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Climate-modeling groups are having to assess their models' temperatures at high, thinly observed altitudes in order to investigate near-tropopause forcings with confidence. To support such analyses, the microwave sounding unit (MSU), GFDL/Oort radiosonde, COSPAR International Reference Atmosphere (CIRA), and new 13-year National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) Reanalysis Project climatologies are intercompared herein in terms of their monthly mean microwave brightness temperatures T-b. In the lower stratosphere these climatologies agree extremely well. Small differences between NCEP/NCAR and MSU T-b centered at about 80 mbar amount to less than or equal to 2 K year round across the tropics and less than or equal to 5 K in southern winter polar latitudes. Artificial land-ocean outlines less than or equal to 2 K do appear in maps of the NCEP/NCAR lower stratospheric T-b between 30 degrees S and 30 degrees N. This NCEP/NCAR land-ocean T-b distinction may be due to sparseness of inputed radiosonde data at lower stratospheric heights not compensated for by satellite retrievals in the NCEP/NCAR assimilation process. In the upper troposphere, good agreement again occurs between the GFDL radiosonde, the CIRA, and the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis T-b. However, the experimental MSU channel 3R climatology has markedly cooler upper tropospheric T-b. Coolness peaks at over 6 K across low latitudes and diminishes to a few kelvins at polar latitudes with little seasonal dependence. The cool bias of the MSU channel 3R is likely due to a combination of channel 3 receiver drift and limb-darkening problems. Latitudinal correction terms are suggested for this experimental, but valuable, MSU product based on comparisons with calculated NCEP/NCAR reanalysis T-b.
引用
收藏
页码:31569 / 31591
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [2] BARNETT JJ, 1985, HDB MAP, V16, P47
  • [3] Basist AN, 1997, B AM METEOROL SOC, V78, P1431, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<1431:COTTDF>2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] SOME RESULTS FROM AN INTERCOMPARISON OF THE CLIMATES SIMULATED BY 14 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
    BOER, GJ
    ARPE, K
    BLACKBURN, M
    DEQUE, M
    GATES, WL
    HART, TL
    LETREUT, H
    ROECKNER, E
    SHEININ, DA
    SIMMONDS, I
    SMITH, RNB
    TOKIOKA, T
    WETHERALD, RT
    WILLIAMSON, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D12) : 12771 - 12786
  • [6] BOYLE J, 1997, 42 MDI L LIV NATL LA
  • [7] Champion K. S. W., 1985, HDB GEOPHYS SPACE EN
  • [8] *COMM SPAC RES, 1990, ADV SPACE RES, V11
  • [9] IMPACTS OF MODEL IMPROVEMENTS ON GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL SENSITIVITY TO SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE FORCING
    DRUYAN, LM
    SHAH, KP
    LO, KWK
    MARENGO, JA
    RUSSELL, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 1995, 15 (10) : 1061 - 1086
  • [10] Fleming EL, 1988, TM100697 NASA