Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer

被引:32
作者
Fritscher-Ravens, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal London Hosp, Endoscopy Unit, Dept Gastroenterol, London E1 1BB, England
关键词
EUS; ELIS-FNA lung cancer; diagnostic; staging;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-5002(03)00229-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The detection of mediastinal lymph node metastases in patients with lung cancer is most important. These nodes may be used for tissue diagnosis of the malignancy, if sampling techniques of the primary have failed. Their presence implies a stage III disease and may exclude a patient from surgery. CT is the standard imaging, but is relatively poor at staging the mediastinum (overall sensitivity: 50-70%), and is especially unreliable for lesions < 1 cm. PET is a new physiological imaging technique, which seems to be superior to CT (sensitivity: 67-100%). Transesophageal EUS delivers high resolution imaging, offers the advantage of simultaneous tissue sampling (EUS-FNA sensitivity: 84-94%), but is limited to the posterior mediastinum. This review compares the diagnostic value of CT, PET and EUS as well as the different tissue sampling methods for mediastinal metastases with EUS-FNA. The technique of EUS and FNA is described, and a special interest is taken to stress out the different areas of the mediastinum accessible for each of the tissue sampling methods as well as the pros and cons for its use. Advantages and disadvantages of EUS-FNA are shown and the new efforts described to improve the outcome of EUS-FNA by adding molecular methods for the detection of micrometastases. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 267
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Cost-efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration vs. mediastinotomy in patients with lung cancer and suspected mediastinal adenopathy [J].
Aabakken, L ;
Silvestri, GA ;
Hawes, R ;
Reed, CE ;
Marsi, V ;
Hoffman, B .
ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 31 (09) :707-711
[2]  
ARROLIGA AC, 1993, CLIN CHEST MED, V14, P87
[3]   Improved technique for performing endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of lymph nodes [J].
Bhutani, MS ;
Suryaprasad, S ;
Moezzi, J ;
Seabrook, D .
ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 31 (07) :550-553
[4]   A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion [J].
Bhutani, MS ;
Hawes, RH ;
Hoffman, BJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (06) :474-479
[5]   Imaging of mediastinal lymph nodes: CT, MR, and FDG PET [J].
Boiselle, PM ;
Patz, EF ;
Vining, DJ ;
Weissleder, R ;
Shepard, JO ;
McLoud, TC .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (05) :1061-1069
[6]   ENDOSONOGRAPHIC FEATURES PREDICTIVE OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS [J].
CATALANO, MF ;
SIVAK, MV ;
RICE, T ;
GRAGG, LA ;
VANDAM, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (04) :442-446
[7]   Role of transesophageal endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lung cancer [J].
Fritscher-Ravens, A ;
Soehendra, N ;
Schirrow, L ;
Sriram, PVJ ;
Meyer, A ;
Hauber, HP ;
Pforte, A .
CHEST, 2000, 117 (02) :339-345
[8]   Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of mediastinal masses in patients with intrapulmonary lesions and nondiagnostic bronchoscopy [J].
Fritscher-Ravens, A ;
Petrasch, S ;
Reinacher-Schick, A ;
Graeven, U ;
König, M ;
Schmiegel, W .
RESPIRATION, 1999, 66 (02) :150-155
[9]   Mediastinal lymph node involvement in potentially resectable lung cancer -: Comparison of CT, positron emission tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography with and without fine-needle aspiration [J].
Fritscher-Ravens, A ;
Bohuslavizki, KH ;
Brandt, L ;
Bobrowski, C ;
Lund, C ;
Knöfel, T ;
Pforte, A .
CHEST, 2003, 123 (02) :442-451
[10]  
Fritscher-Ravens A, 2000, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V95, P2278