Integrating linear physical programming within collaborative optimization for multiobjective multidisciplinary design optimization

被引:54
作者
McAllister, CD
Simpson, TW [1 ]
Hacker, K
Lewis, K
Messac, A
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech & Nucl, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[4] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Dept Mech Aerosp & Nucl Engn, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[5] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
collaborative optimization; multidisciplinary design optimization; multiobjective optimization; physical programming;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-004-0481-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) is a concurrent engineering design tool for large-scale, complex systems design that can be affected through the optimal design of several smaller functional units or subsystems. Due to the multiobjective nature of most MDO problems, recent work has focused on formulating the MDO problem to resolve tradeoffs between multiple, conflicting objectives. In this paper, we describe the novel integration of linear physical programming within the collaborative optimization framework, which enables designers to formulate multiple system-level objectives in terms of physically meaningful parameters. The proposed formulation extends our previous multiobjective formulation of collaborative optimization, which uses goal programming at the system and subsystem levels to enable multiple objectives to be considered at both levels during optimization. The proposed framework is demonstrated using a racecar design example that consists of two subsystem level analyses - force and aerodynamics - and incorporates two system-level objectives: (1) minimize lap time and (2) maximize normalized weight distribution. The aerodynamics subsystem also seeks to minimize rearwheel downforce as a secondary objective. The racecar design example is presented in detail to provide a benchmark problem for other researchers. It is solved using the proposed formulation and compared against a traditional formulation without collaborative optimization or linear physical programming. The proposed framework capitalizes on the disciplinary organization encountered during large-scale systems design.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 189
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, T OPERATIONAL RES
[2]   Optimization of coupled systems: A critical overview of approaches [J].
Balling, RJ ;
SobieszczanskiSobieski, J .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1996, 34 (01) :6-17
[3]   Execution of multidisciplinary design optimization approaches on common test problems [J].
Balling, RJ ;
Wilkinson, CA .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1997, 35 (01) :178-186
[4]  
Braun R, 1996, 6 AIAA NASA ISSMO S, P295
[5]   Collaborative approach to launch vehicle design [J].
Braun, RD ;
Moore, AA ;
Kroo, IM .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1997, 34 (04) :478-486
[6]  
Braun RD, 1997, SIAM PROC S, P98
[7]   Exploration of the effectiveness of physical programming in robust design [J].
Chen, W ;
Sahai, A ;
Messac, A ;
Sundararaj, GJ .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2000, 122 (02) :155-163
[8]  
Chen W., 1996, ASME J MECH DESIGN, V118, P478
[9]  
Cramer E.J., 1994, SIAM J OPTIMIZ, V4, P754, DOI DOI 10.1137/0804044
[10]  
GU X, 2001, ASME DES ENG TECH C