A new approach for remote sensing of canopy-absorbed photosynthetically active radiation .1. Total surface absorption

被引:20
作者
Li, ZQ [1 ]
Moreau, L [1 ]
机构
[1] INTERA INFORMAT TECHNOL LTD, OTTAWA, ON, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0034-4257(95)00097-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Thr canopy-absorbed photosynthstically active radiation APAR(CAN) is the solar energy consumed in the canopy photosynthetic process. Due to the difficulty of acquiring extensive ground-based observations, increasing efforts are being devoted to estimate APAR(CAN) from optical satellite measurements. So far, APAR(CAN) has been obtained from the downwelling PAR at the surface (SFC), PAR(SFC)down arrow, and the fraction of PAR absorbed by a canopy, FPAR. This study proposes a new approach which defines APAR(CAN) as the product of APAR(SFC) and RPAR. APAR(SFC) is the total PAR absorbed by all surface materials including canopy, soil, litter, etc., while RPAR is the ratio of the PAR absorbed by the green canopy only, to APAR(SFC). The advantage of this approach is that APAR(SFC) can be determined more accurately and readily than PAR(SFC)down arrow, while the determination of RPAR is as accurate as that of FPAR with the same difficulties. The whole approach is introduced in two parts. Part I, as presented in this article, deals with the retrieval of APAR(SFC). Using a complex atmospheric radiative transfer model, APAR(SFC) is related to the upwelling PAR reflected at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), PAR(TOA)up arrow. The relationship is independent of cloud parameters and surface conditions, and moderately dependent on ozone amount and aerosol optical properties. A parameterization teas developed to estimate APAR(SFC) from PAR(TOA)up arrow, which is inferred from satellite measurements in the visible bands. Error analyses were made using data from both model simulations and field observations. The parameterization is valid to within 5 W m(-2) compared to the results of detailed radiation model simulations. A preliminary comparison against FIFE ground observations showed a bias error of - 2.7 W m(-2) and a standard error of 21.9 W m(-2) for the instantaneous estimates of APAR(SFC).
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 191
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GLOBAL ECOLOGY
  • [2] ESTIMATING ABSORBED PHOTOSYNTHETIC RADIATION AND LEAF-AREA INDEX FROM SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE IN WHEAT
    ASRAR, G
    FUCHS, M
    KANEMASU, ET
    HATFIELD, JL
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (02) : 300 - 306
  • [3] RELATION BETWEEN PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY AVAILABLE RADIATION AND TOTAL INSOLATION AT THE OCEAN SURFACE UNDER CLEAR SKIES
    BAKER, KS
    FROUIN, R
    [J]. LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1987, 32 (06) : 1370 - 1377
  • [4] Braslau N., 1973, Journal of Applied Meteorology, V12, P601, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1973)012<0601:EOAOTT>2.0.CO
  • [5] 2
  • [6] AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH RETRIEVALS OVER THE KONZA PRAIRIE
    BRUEGGE, CJ
    HALTHORE, RN
    MARKHAM, B
    SPANNER, M
    WRIGLEY, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D17) : 18743 - 18758
  • [7] AVHRR BIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCE EFFECTS AND COMPOSITING
    CIHLAR, J
    MANAK, D
    VOISIN, N
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 48 (01) : 77 - 88
  • [8] d'Almeida G.A., 1991, ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS
  • [9] COMPARISON OF GROUND-BASED AND SATELLITE-BASED MEASUREMENTS OF THE FRACTION OF PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION INTERCEPTED BY TALLGRASS PRAIRIE
    DEMETRIADESSHAH, TH
    KANEMASU, ET
    FLITCROFT, ID
    SU, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D17) : 18947 - 18950
  • [10] DYE DG, 1993, INT J REMOTE SENS, V14, P3361, DOI 10.1080/01431169308904452