Impact of Caseload on Total Hospital Charges: A Direct Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Radical Prostatectomy-A Population Based Study

被引:21
作者
Abdollah, Firas [1 ,2 ]
Budaeus, Lars [1 ,3 ]
Sun, Maxine [1 ]
Morgan, Monica [1 ]
Johal, Rupinder [1 ]
Thuret, Rodolphe [1 ]
Zorn, Kevin C. [1 ]
Isbarn, Hendrik [3 ]
Haese, Alexander [3 ]
Jeldres, Claudio [1 ]
Perrotte, Paul [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [2 ]
Graefen, Markus [3 ]
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hlth, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcome Unit, Montreal, PQ H2X 3J4, Canada
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Hosp San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Prostate Canc Ctr, Martiniclin, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; surgical procedures; minimally invasive; hospital charges; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
Purpose: We tested the relationship between caseload and total hospital charges after stratifying by minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 1,188 vs 3,354 men treated with minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy in the Florida Hospital Inpatients data file in 2008. Caseload was defined as the count of procedures performed by each surgeon between the study start on January 1, 2008 and the date of each procedure. Patients were divided into tertiles based on their procedure specific caseload. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to address the relation between caseload and total hospital charges for the minimally invasive and open procedures. Covariates were patient age, race, comorbidity, and length of stay. Results: Median total hospital charges for minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy were $33,234 and $33,674, respectively (p = 0.03). Median total hospital charges in the low, intermediate and high minimally invasive vs open procedure caseload tertiles were $41,765, $34,799 and $28,780 vs $35,642, $34,726 and $32,726, respectively. On multivariate analysis with the high minimally invasive caseload tertile as the reference category the increments of the probability of charges in excess of the 2008 median of $33,588 were 3.9 and 8.1-fold for the intermediate and low caseload minimally invasive procedures, and 2.5, 3.6 and 2.8-fold for the high, intermediate and low caseload open procedures, respectively (each p < 0.001). Conclusions: Overall median total hospital charges are virtually the same for minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy. However, total hospital charges for the minimally invasive procedure have a more sensitive caseload effect, as evidenced by the wider distribution of the median of minimally invasive caseload specific total hospital charges vs that of open radical prostatectomy. The high caseload minimally invasive procedure resulted in the lowest total hospital charges relative to all other minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy categories.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 861
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Abdi Herve., 2007, ENCY MEASUREMENT STA, P1
[2]
Agency_for_Health_Care_Administration_State_Center_for_Health_Statistics, 2004, HLTH OUTC SER, P5
[3]
Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. [J].
Begg, CB ;
Riedel, ER ;
Bach, PB ;
Kattan, MW ;
Schrag, D ;
Warren, JL ;
Scardino, PT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1138-1144
[4]
Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Stukel, TA ;
Siewers, AE ;
Goodney, PP ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Lucas, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (22) :2117-2127
[5]
Hospital Complication Rates With Bariatric Surgery in Michigan [J].
Birkmeyer, Nancy J. O. ;
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Share, David ;
Hawasli, Abdelkader ;
English, Wayne J. ;
Genaw, Jeffrey ;
Finks, Jonathan F. ;
Carlin, Arthur M. ;
Birkmeyer, John D. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (04) :435-442
[6]
Cost Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Bolenz, Christian ;
Gupta, Amit ;
Hotze, Timothy ;
Ho, Richard ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Roehrborn, Claus G. ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) :453-458
[7]
Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes [J].
Box, Geoffrey N. ;
Ahlering, Thomas E. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) :173-179
[8]
Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy [J].
Burgess, Scott V. ;
Atug, Fatih ;
Castle, Erik P. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Thomas, Raju .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (10) :827-830
[9]
The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: Trends in clinical presentation and primary management [J].
Cooperberg, MR ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Meni, MV ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (11) :2141-2149
[10]
Will robotic surgery become the gold standard for radical prostatectomy? [J].
Descazeaud, Aurelien ;
Peyromaure, Michael ;
Zerbib, Marc .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (01) :9-11