War zones and game sinks in Lewis and Clark's west

被引:109
作者
Martin, PS
Szuter, CR
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Geosci, Desert Lab, Tucson, AZ 85745 USA
[2] Univ Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97417.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The journals of Lewis and Clark reveal a major difference in the taxa, numbers, and behavior of megafauna on either side of the Rocky Mountains in western North America Two prior events set the stage for what Lewis and Clark would find. The first was the extinction around 13,000 years ago of two-thirds of the native megafauna of the American West The second was the effects on Indians of deadly new diseases and new technologies brought by Europeans in the post-Columbian era. Populations of large animals which were preferred prey for native people, were not immune to European influence. Along the Columbia River corridor west of the Rockies, tens of thousands of people lived in a game sink. Here Lewis and Clark's party found too few animals to live off the land by hunting They adapted poorly to the local diet of fish and roots offered by the Net Perce and bought dogs and horses to sustain themselves. To the east, uninhabited lands along the Upper Missouri and the Yellowstone rivers supported an abundance of wild game especially bison, elk, deer, pronghorn, and wolves. This game source occupied part of a buffer zone of 120,000 km(2) probed by various Indian war parties, some of them armed with muskets. William Clark recognized the relationship and near the end of their journey he wrote that they found large numbers of large animals in the land between nations that were at war Both the abundance of game in buffer or war zones and scarcity of big game in sinks have been misinterpreted as a natural or typical condition. Although efforts to restore ecosystems to what is described in early journals may have merit, they are aimed at a flickering target. Long before these journals were written, the land had been stripped of most of its native megafauna th;through human influence. In the absence of humans, we predict that much larger populations of bison, elk, deer, and wolves would have ranged the West than were reported in historic documents.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 45
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   INTRASPECIFIC PREY CHOICE BY AMAZONIAN HUNTERS [J].
ALVARD, M .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 1995, 36 (05) :789-818
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, TRADE AM W 1807 40 G
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, RUZHYA MIKROBY STALI
[4]   CONSEQUENCES OF A MAMMALIAN PREDATOR-PREY DISEQUILIBRIUM IN THE GREAT-BASIN DESERT [J].
BERGER, J ;
WEHAUSEN, JD .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1991, 5 (02) :244-248
[5]  
BIGGAR H, 1925, WORKS S DECHAPLAIN
[6]  
Botkin D., 1995, OUR NATURAL HIST LES
[7]   Widening diet breadth, declining foraging efficiency, and prehistoric harvest pressure: ichthyofaunal evidence hem the Emeryville Shellmound, California [J].
Broughton, JM .
ANTIQUITY, 1997, 71 (274) :845-862
[8]  
BURNEY DA, 1993, AM SCI, V81, P530
[9]  
Coues E, 1897, MANUSCRIPT J A HENRY
[10]   THE WESTERN LIMITS OF THE RANGE OF THE AMERICAN BISON [J].
DAUBENMIRE, R .
ECOLOGY, 1985, 66 (02) :622-624