The United States and Russia evaluate plutonium disposition options with multiattribute utility theory

被引:11
作者
Butler, JC
Chebeskov, AN
Dyer, JS
Edmunds, TA
Jia, JM
Oussanov, VI
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Fisher Sch Business, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Inst Phys & Power Engn, Dept Nucl Power & Plutonium Disposit, Obninsk 249033, Kaluga Region, Russia
[3] Univ Texas, McCombs Sch Business, Dept Management Sci & Informat Syst, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Syst & Decis Sci Sect, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Business Adm, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
government : agencies; decision analysis : multiple criteria;
D O I
10.1287/inte.1040.0112
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
At the end of the Cold War, the United States and Russia entered into agreements to reduce the numbers of nuclear weapons in their arsenals. The excess-weapons plutonium recovered from dismantled weapons is extremely toxic in the environment, and the National Academy of Sciences has characterized the possibility that it could fall into the hands of terrorists as a "clear and present danger." A team of operations research analysts supported the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (OFMD) in the US Department of Energy (DOE) by developing a multiattribute utility (MAU) model to evaluate alternatives for the disposition of the excess-weapons plutonium. Russian scientists modified the model with the aid of the US team and used it to evaluate Russia's disposition alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 101
页数:14
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
CHEBESKOV AN, 1999, 3 M CONTR EXP GROUP
[2]  
CHEBESKOV AN, 2001, JOINT STEER COMM M I
[3]  
CHEBESKOV AN, 1998, WORKSH ISTC PROJ BRU
[4]  
DEFFRENNES M, 2004, COMMUNICATION 0413
[5]  
*DOE PEIS, 1996, DOEEIS0229 US DOE OF
[6]  
*DOE ROD, 1997, REC DEC STOR DISP WE
[7]  
*DOE TSR, 1996, DOEMD0003 OFF FIS MA
[8]   A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium [J].
Dyer, JS ;
Edmunds, T ;
Butler, JC ;
Jia, JM .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1998, 46 (06) :749-762
[9]  
DYER JS, 1997, 19971 AM NAT RES CTR
[10]  
DYER JS, 1996, INT M MIL CONV SCI U