Comparison of biomechanical response to surgical procedures used for cervical radiculopathy: Posterior keyhole foraminotomy versus anterior foraminotomy and discectomy versus anterior discectomy with fusion

被引:51
作者
Chen, BH [1 ]
Natarajan, RN [1 ]
An, HS [1 ]
Andersson, GBJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS | 2001年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
biomechanics; cervical spine; finite element model; discectomy; foraminotomy; laminectomy; fusion;
D O I
10.1097/00002517-200102000-00004
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to compare the change in flexibility of C5-C6 caused by three procedures using a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model: posterior foraminotomy (keyhole procedure), anterior foraminotomy with discectomy, and anterior discectomy with fusion. The keyhole procedure produced a minor increase in motion. The anterior foraminotomy and discectomy produced one to mio times greater motion. Anterior discectomy with fusion produced 50% to 100% reduction in motion. The posterior keyhole foraminotomy has a much lesser effect on the stability of the cervical spine segment than does an anterior procedure, and fusion is a requisite part of the anterior decompression procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 20
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
PREDICTION OF BONE-GRAFT STRENGTH USING DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHIC ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
AN, HS ;
XU, RM ;
LIM, TH ;
MCGRADY, L ;
WILSON, C .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (20) :2358-2363
[2]
COMPARISON BETWEEN ALLOGRAFT PLUS DEMINERALIZED BONE-MATRIX VERSUS AUTOGRAFT IN ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
AN, HS ;
SIMPSON, JM ;
GLOVER, JM ;
STEPHANY, J .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (20) :2211-2216
[3]
IDEAL THICKNESS OF SMITH-ROBINSON GRAFT FOR ANTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION - A CADAVERIC STUDY WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC CORRELATION [J].
AN, HS ;
EVANICH, CJ ;
NOWICKI, BH ;
HAUGHTON, VM .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (14) :2043-2047
[4]
ANTERIOR CERVICAL FORAMINOTOMY AND FUSION - SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND RESULTS [J].
BRIGHAM, CD ;
TSAHAKIS, PJ .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (07) :766-770
[5]
Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: Quantification using a finite element model of the C5-C6 segment [J].
Clausen, JD ;
Goel, VK ;
Traynelis, VC ;
Scifert, J .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (03) :342-347
[6]
THE ANTERIOR APPROACH FOR REMOVAL OF RUPTURED CERVICAL DISKS [J].
CLOWARD, RB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1958, 15 (06) :602-617
[7]
MALONE DG, 1998, CERVICAL SPINE, P817
[8]
LOAD DISPLACEMENT PROPERTIES OF LOWER CERVICAL-SPINE MOTION SEGMENTS [J].
MORONEY, SP ;
SCHULTZ, AB ;
MILLER, JAA ;
ANDERSSON, GBJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 21 (09) :769-779
[9]
CERVICAL HUMAN VERTEBRAE - QUANTITATIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ANATOMY OF THE MIDDLE AND LOWER REGIONS [J].
PANJABI, MM ;
DURANCEAU, J ;
GOEL, V ;
OXLAND, T ;
TAKATA, K .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (08) :861-869
[10]
DIFFERENCES IN ANATOMY, MOTION, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING OF THE UPPER AND LOWER CERVICAL DISK SEGMENTS [J].
PENNING, L .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 3 (01) :37-47