Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models

被引:420
作者
Vrugt, JA
Gupta, HV
Bastidas, LA
Bouten, W
Sorooshian, S
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, NL-1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Water Resources, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
parameter optimization; Markov chain Monte Carlo; multicriteria calibration; population diversity; Pareto ranking; hydrologic models;
D O I
10.1029/2002WR001746
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Practical experience with the calibration of hydrologic models suggests that any single-objective function, no matter how carefully chosen, is often inadequate to properly measure all of the characteristics of the observed data deemed to be important. One strategy to circumvent this problem is to define several optimization criteria (objective functions) that measure different (complementary) aspects of the system behavior and to use multicriteria optimization to identify the set of nondominated, efficient, or Pareto optimal solutions. In this paper, we present an efficient and effective Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler, entitled the Multiobjective Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis (MOSCEM) algorithm, which is capable of solving the multiobjective optimization problem for hydrologic models. MOSCEM is an improvement over the Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis (SCEM-UA) global optimization algorithm, using the concept of Pareto dominance (rather than direct single-objective function evaluation) to evolve the initial population of points toward a set of solutions stemming from a stable distribution (Pareto set). The efficacy of the MOSCEM-UA algorithm is compared with the original MOCOM-UA algorithm for three hydrologic modeling case studies of increasing complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:SWC51 / SWC519
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHM SE
[2]   Sensitivity analysis of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods [J].
Bastidas, LA ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S ;
Shuttleworth, WJ ;
Yang, ZL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D16) :19481-19490
[3]  
BASTIDAS LA, 1998, THESIS U ARIZ TUCSON
[4]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[5]  
Beven K.J., 1979, HYDROL SCI B, V24, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834, 10.1080/02626667909491834]
[6]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674
[7]   Toward improved streamflow forecasts: Value of semidistributed modeling [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S ;
Koren, V ;
Zhang, ZY ;
Smith, M .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (11) :2749-2759
[8]   A MULTISIGNAL AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION METHODOLOGY FOR HYDROCHEMICAL MODELS - A CASE-STUDY OF THE BIRKENES MODEL [J].
DEGROSBOIS, E ;
HOOPER, RP ;
CHRISTOPHERSEN, N .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1988, 24 (08) :1299-1307
[9]  
DICKINSON RE, 1993, NCARTN387STR
[10]   OPTIMAL USE OF THE SCE-UA GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR CALIBRATING WATERSHED MODELS [J].
DUAN, QY ;
SOROOSHIAN, S ;
GUPTA, VK .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1994, 158 (3-4) :265-284